MAXIMAL OWNERSHIP TITLE | LAND USE ACT | THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


The foundation of this form of title to land under the Land Use Act is rooted is S.1 of the Act. The section provides:-
“Subject to the provision of this Act, all the land comprised in the territory of each state of the Federation are hereby vested in the Governor of that state and such land shall be held in trust and administered for the use and common benefit of all Nigeria in accordance with the provision of this Act” 3
S. 49 (1) of the Act 4. Significantly modifies this provision and must be read together with it. It provides:
“Nothing in this Act shall affect any title to land whether developed or underdeveloped held by the Federal Government or any agency of the Federal Government at the common cement of this Act and accordingly and such land shall continue to vest in the Federal Government or the agency concerned”.
The combined effects of SS.1 and 49 (1) as trenchantly discussed and explained by the count of appeal in Ona V Atenda 5, is to repose the ownership of the maximal title to all lands in Nigeria – whether in the form of absolute title or radical title – in only three categories of owners, namely: The Federal Government, existing Federal Government Agencies and the State Government of each state.
All those things identified in chapter two of this work who owned such title under the pre – existing order – i.e., the community, the chieftaincy office, individuals and cooperate bodies are completely excluded. The position of the three ownership – holding bodies is as follows:

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
The Federal Government retains and holds the absolute and beneficial ownership of all lands, when ever located, vested in it at the commencement of the Land Use Act, this is, as on 29th March, 1978; whether such lands are developed or underdeveloped. One major example of such land are lands comprised in the Federal Capital Territory Abuja, the ownership of which, had been vested in the Federal Government since 1976 by S. 1(3) of the Federal Capital Territory Act 1976 6.
Other examples are lands located in different state territories in respect of which, the Nigeria fee simple title has been vested in the Federal Government before the Land Use Act by virtue of the compulsory acquisition statists. The Federal Government holds the ownership of such land absolutely for its own use or benefit and not in trust for any person or organization. S. 49(1) of the Act 7 provides that nothing in the Act shall affect such title and according the lands concerned shall continue to vet absolutely in the Federal Government.

ANY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY IN EXISTENCE AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE LAND USE ACT
A Federal Government Agency is defined in S. 49(2) of the Act 8 to including statutory establishment. But the Act is silent on the quantum of land to be given to a “Deemed Holder” of right of occupancy in a rural area. Therefore, it is safe to conclude, that a deemed holder can hold any quantum of land, without restriction, whether developed or underdeveloped in a rural area.
Therefore, the land today is no more a subject of ownership as it used to be before the Land Use Act, 1978.
The only interest capable of enjoyment in land is more possessory right in the nature of right of occupancy, which may be statutory, customary or deemed right of occupancy.
Share on Google Plus

Declaimer - MARTINS LIBRARY

The publications and/or documents on this website are provided for general information purposes only. Your use of any of these sample documents is subjected to your own decision NB: Join our Social Media Network on Google Plus | Facebook | Twitter | Linkedin

READ RECENT UPDATES HERE