RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND THE PRESS - KNOW YOUR RIGHT



By virtue of the provisions of section 39 (1) of the 1999 constitution, every person shall be entitled to freedom of expression which includes freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart ideas and information without interference. The right to freedom of speech, according to Bernard shaw, is predication on the theory that “ every body is wrong on some point on which somebody also is right so that there is a public danger in allowing anybody to unheard”. Also justice Cardozo said in PALKO V. CONNECTICUT, an American case, that freedom of expression is “the matrix, the indispensable condition of nearly every other form of speech”. Also, professor Ajomo eloquently stated that freedom of expression is the bedrock of democratic
process. It stems from that fact that no one has the monopoly of truth. Based on this ground, it is apparently proved in section 39(2) that without prejudice to the provision of section 39(2), every person shall be entitled to own, establish and operate any medium for the dissemination of information, ideas and opinions.

          It is implied in this section that every person has the right to establish private schools and higher institution in OKOGIE V. A. G. of LAGOS STATE (1981) INCLR 218, it was held that section 36 (2) of the 1979 constitution (which is impair materia with section 39 (2) of the 1999 constitution) guaranteed the right to establish any medium for the dissemination of information, ideas and opinions and this includes establishment of schools or institutions for imparting information, ideas, knowledge and opinions.
          The freedom of expression and the press guaranteed under the constitution can be restricted in that under section 45 of the 1999 constitution, the state is permitted to make any law which is reasonably justifiable in a democratic society in the interest of defense, public safety, public order, public morality, public health or for protecting the rights and freedoms of other person shall may in turn restrict the freedom of speech, and the press. Meanwhile, section 39(3) provides that a law shall not be invalidated if it is reasonably justifiable in a democratic society:

a.            for the purpose of preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, maintaining the authority and independence of court or regulating telephone, wireless broadcasting, television or the exhibition of cinematograph films or.
b.            Imposing restrictions upon persons holding office under the government of the federation or of a state, member of the armed forces of the federation or members of the Nigeria police force or other government security services or agencies established by law.

Journalists are immune from being compelled to disclose the source of their information, but a journalist can be compelled to reveal the source of information in the public interest.
In SENATE V. TONY MOMOH the plaintiff, editor of Daily Times, was summoned by the senate of the national assembly to come and disclose the source of his information of an article about how senators lobby for contracts from the executive branch of government. The High Court held that any attempt to force the plaintiff to disclose the source of has information, apparently given in confidence, is an infringement on his freedom of expression without interference, guaranteed by the constitution.
          On appeal by the senate to the court of appeal, the court held that mere invitation by the senate did not infringe the fundamental right of the respondent and the appeal was upheld.


RELATED INFORMATION
 
Share on Google Plus

Declaimer - Unknown

The publications and/or documents on this website are provided for general information purposes only. Your use of any of these sample documents is subjected to your own decision NB: Join our Social Media Network on Google Plus | Facebook | Twitter | Linkedin

READ RECENT UPDATES HERE