WHY DO PEOPLE CRITICIZE PUBLIC POLICIES AND STILL OBEY THEM?

One cannot give the reasons while people are criticize polices and on the and, still obey them without being given the meaning of public policies itself.
According to J.A Egonnwan, public policy deals with the under listed. As a filed of study public has a recent origin.
It came into existence only in the early  1950s  and  here is not as yet any commonly accepted definition of the form while policy studies  remain a burgeoning field of  activity, its
status to some is itself problematic.
Generally,  the term public policy is sometimes  referred to  as a government  programmer of action. It stands for various degrees  of  goals articulation and normative regulation of government activities that is what government intends to  do or achieve (goals)  and how it  intends  to do it (implements).  The controversy in existing literature I.C political science, however, is over the boundary of what should constitute public policy should it be posited at the  level of decision making, intention or action of  government? Some believe that public policy is whatever   government choose to do or not to do .
Others assert  that policy is  why government actually do… not what they intend to do or say they are  going to do./ this dissension has led to various  definitions. A few of such definitions are noted below and either utility for analysis commented upon.
One definition   of public policy contends, “public policy refers to important activities of government. This definition highlights action only and does not give a complete picture of what policy entails. Another definition states that policy is “a purposive   course of action followed by an actor or set in dealing with a problem or matter of concern”.   Of policy focuses attention this concept   of policy focuses attention of what is actually done (action) as against what is intended or proposed. Implicit in this definition is that a distinction is made between a policy and a decision, which is a choice among competing alternatives.
It does not however, stipulate what is or what is not important.  Thomas dye on the other hand has defined public policy to means  “whatever government choose to do or not to do”. This definition   does not take into consideration the fact that the definition could be taken to  include how action like staff recruitment  or giant  of  licenses, which  are usually not regarded as policy matter
It however, posits policy as  the decision of government.  To some  extent, the definitions of the  school or thought, that is, policy as decisions and intentions of government.  And policy as actions of governments are right in relating public policy to the deliberate decisions or actions of government. 
However, it would be dangerous to accept them as a proper basis for policy analysis because of narrow scope of the definitions. The  weakness of definitions are as follows:  

1.                  The notion is encouraged that governments may do or retrain form doing whatever they like. This is a totalitarian concept,. Which may be  repulsive to modern government  support and encouragement or citizens  participation in public decision making is affecting them.
2.                  Nothing but  confusion  and failure will ensue  from a situation where government make polices arbitrarily and change them equally arbitrarily.   Hence the need to ensure that every policy decision proceeded by a clear articulation of its objectives and through examination of its implementation, its probable consequences and possible remedies.
3.                  The definition fails to provide basis for distinguishing policy formulated from. Policy implementation. According to the definitions, all actions and decision of government are decision…”adding that” the  sense of continuous activity and adjustment involved in policy making is best conveyed by describing it as a process rather  them as single   once  for all act

Although there is ambiguity  in the definition of Rose,  it introduces an  important notion that policy is a process in pattern of  activity  and not simple a  decision  to do something. In a similar vein, W.I   Jenkins defines  policy as “a  set of interrelated decisions by a political actor or group of action deliberately  taken  by government to solve a social problem  as essential  taken by government  to solve a  social decision makers where fully  aware of their choice of goals and the means to achieve.   
It  also suggests that the decision makers gave consideration to one or more other proposals.  Aspire all, Jenkins sees public as aggregate decision making as against single discrete decision.  It recognized the need for availability of means to achieve given ends as well as competence of certain persons to take decisions on behalf of others . It also  “ a government without a definite programmes of action is like a travelers without destination. He  may  cover many kilometers and yet not be able  to say where he is going or how far he has gone”  this  is to say that such government may not be able to asses its performance based on feedback.
Like that of Jenkins, the  definition recognized that there are a few people i.e.  the actors who have the authority and responsibility to develop policies on behalf of the many in the society.
Why do we study public policy form the forgoing, public policy can be regarded as  course of action aimed  at finding solutions specific problem. As a  course of action, we need to study and  understand both the content and process of  policy making include the organizational setting of policy making.  The cause and consequences of a public policy must also be studied.  We need to know for examples, what the issue is i.e. the social decision making, how decisions are made, what is done to achieve results (implementation strategies and how we evaluate what has been chosen to achieve results (i.e.  policy   instruments) and the results them sales i.e. output and outcomes all these can be broken down into   a number of categories as follows 
1.       Policy  demands
2.       Policy decisions
3.       Policy statements
4.       Policy out puts
5.       Policy  outcomes 
Policy demand: this is the claims  made upon public officials by other actors, private or official in political system for action[n or inaction on some perceived problem
The   demands that help give rise to public policy  and which  it  is designed to satisfy, at least in part are important items for consideration in the study  of public policy.
Policy decision; decision   are made by public officials that authorized or give direction and  content of public actions are studied in public policy.  Included in the study are decisions to enact statutes, issue executive orders or edicts, promulgate administrative rules or make important judicial interpretations of laws.
Policy statements:  formal expressing  or articulation of public policy, which include, legislative statues, decrees,  presidential orders, administration rules and regulation and court opinions,  statements and speeches by public  officials indication the intentions  and goals of government and what will be done to realize them. As   indicated earlier policy statement is sometime ambiguous and conflict   policy out puts: these includes tangible  manifestations of policies,, namely those  things actually done in pursuance of policy decisions and statements. This means what a government does as distinct from what it says going to do  eg  actual taxes    collected, number of high ways constructed, amount of drugs purchased for the hospitals, trade  liberation, import restrictions, tariff s imposed etc . this also included the new organizational units set up or renovation of existing ones done for the purpose of implementations  policy out come:    they   are the  intended or unintended consequences of policies that flow from action or inaction by government.
Take the case of the structural adjustment programme in Nigeria (sap) the consequences are intended gains, important in rural incomes and local sourcing  of needed raw materials for industries and unintended pains hardship for families because of prevailing high rate of inflation, low disposal income and poor purchasing power of Nigeria. In all these, is   need to know whether or not policies   a complies what they  are intended to a accomplish, it is also the task of  policy evolution
Share on Google Plus

Declaimer - Unknown

The publications and/or documents on this website are provided for general information purposes only. Your use of any of these sample documents is subjected to your own decision NB: Join our Social Media Network on Google Plus | Facebook | Twitter | Linkedin

READ RECENT UPDATES HERE