FELICITY CONDITIONS OF PRAGMATICS

Ndimele (2007:139) has it that the concept of felicity condition was proposed by Austin (1962). He agrees that there are certain criteria which must be satisfied by a speech act if it must be termed successful (that is to achieve its communicative purposes). These requirements which are necessary in the accomplishment of any illocutionary act, are what Austin (1962) refers to as felicity condition.
An illocutionary act is adjudged felicitous, if it met certain condition under which words can be used properly to perform actions, or adjudged infelicitous if such words fail such conditions. Austin in Huang (2007) distinguishes three types of felicity conditions, they are, preparatory, sincerity and essential conditions.

A)      Preparatory condition:  Ndimele (2007) noted that this refers to those requirements which specify that the person performing a particular speech act must have the right to do so. Austin stated that in this condition there must be a conventional procedure, having a conventional effect. For instance,

The accused Koje, is pronounced guilty on 7 count charges of
armed robbery and related offences. 

In order for this utterance to be felicitous, it should be said in a court of law, and said by the proper persons, in accordance with court procedure. But if the person performing the act has no right to perform it, or the act is being performed in an inappropriate situation, and place, then the act is declared null and void, or what Austin refers to as MISFIRE.
B)      Sincerity condition: The procedure here must be executed correctly and completely. But if the person performing the act is insincere, then the sincerity condition has been flouted. The flouting of this condition is what Austin calls ABUSE.
C)      Executive condition: Osisanwo (2003) states that this condition demands every speech act to be supported by positive action. That is, by way of enforcing the necessary actions that emanated from it.
D)      Fulfillment condition:  This demands to know the perlocutionary effect of the speech act on the participant / listener.
Share on Google Plus

Declaimer - Unknown

The publications and/or documents on this website are provided for general information purposes only. Your use of any of these sample documents is subjected to your own decision NB: Join our Social Media Network on Google Plus | Facebook | Twitter | Linkedin

READ RECENT UPDATES HERE