EMPIRICAL LITERATURE OF IMPACT OF FOREIGN AID ON POVERTY IN NIGERIA

Masud and Yontcheva (2005) assess the effectiveness of foreign aid in reducing poverty through its impact on human development indicators and whether foreign aid reduces government efforts in achieving developmental goals. They use a dataset of both bilateral aid and NGO aid flows. Their results show that NGO aid reduces infant mortality and does so more effectively than official bilateral aid. They also find that impact on illiteracy is less significant while mixed evidence of a substitution effect exists for whether foreign aid reduces government efforts in achieving developmental goals.
Salop et al (2007) evaluates in the context of continuing debate about the role of the IMF in aid to low-income countries, what, and how well, the IMF has
done on aid to Sub- Saharan Africa. The study focuses on IMF policy and practice in operations supported by the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF), being the IMF’s main instrument for operational work in low-income countries during the 1999–2005 review periods. The study find that PRGF-supported macroeconomic policies generally accommodate the use of incremental aid in countries whose recent policies have led to high stocks of reserves and low inflation; in other countries additional aids are programmed to be saved to increase reserves or to retire domestic debt. It also finds that IMF communications on aid and poverty reduction have contributed to the external impression that the IMF committed to do more on aid mobilization and poverty-reduction analysis.
Diouf (2007) investigates the determinants of inflation in Mali between 1979 and 2006, and argues that variations in Mali’s consumer price index (CPI) are driven by changes in food prices, with food items accounting for 50 percent of the CPI. It also finds that where households at the bottom quintile of the income distribution spend more than 80 percent of their income on food, controlling food price inflation may greatly reduce poverty. When food price inflation is high, the cost of food leaves few resources for expenditures like health and education. In the extreme case, high food price inflation leads to hunger. Similarly, high non-food price inflation reduces real money balances and the income that can be spent on food, again leading to food insecurity. The study concludes that understanding the determinants of inflation is important in designing policies that can
improve food security in Mali.
Usman and Lemo (2007) examines the Seven-Point Policy Agenda of the incumbent civilian administration in Nigeria, designed to address the fundamental issues of development with a view to ensuring that ongoing reforms are accelerated. The agenda includes: Power and Energy, Food Security and Agriculture, Wealth Creation and Employment, Mass Transportation, Land Reforms, Security and Qualitative and Functional Education. On food security and agriculture, it is argued that the Food Security and Agriculture Policy are linked with the need to address the MDG One –eradication of extreme poverty and hunger. The emphasis is on the development of modern technology and a financial framework for research, production and development of agricultural inputs, which will deliver a 5-10 fold increase in yield and production. Finally, the debate on the definition and measurement of poverty remains inconclusive (Ravallion, 1996 and Laderchi et al, 2003). 

Most studies on poverty rely on monetary poverty measures such as the head count index. However, it has been argued that possessing an increased income does not necessarily mean an improvement in the wellbeing of people especially if this increased income does not translate to access to basic necessities of life. Also, despite the fact that monetary measure is simple, studies have shown that it is deficient (Ravallion, 1996). Ravallion argues that since poverty is multi-faceted, multiple indicators are necessary including measures of distribution of real expenditure per adult, access to non-market goods like health and education, distribution within households and the personal characteristics of the poor. Thus, to measure poverty effectively there is the need to go beyond money metric measures. It is necessary to employ multi dimensional approach in which expenditure on market goods is placed side-by-side with “non-income” goods and indicators of intra-household distribution, understand its causes more so that better policies that can fight it can be formulated.
The essence of international aid is to strengthen fragile or strategic states and improve trade relations with the West. By this, it aims at improving the standard of living of people living in the recipient states. Thus the empirical review looks at what other scholars have studied about foreign aid in relation to poverty and the economy of the recipient countries.

          Abiola and Olofin (2008), studied on foreign aid, food supply and poverty reduction in Nigeria using econometric analysis. Based on their report, only growth rate of rural population and food supply are significant in explaining rural development and they contributed positively although this is not much.
          However with reference to the model specification, they observed a negative relationship between total aid and rural development but if all aid is not lumped together, some aid such as multilateral aid impacts positively on rural development, although with non significant t-statistics. Moreso, they showed that multilateral and total grant aid are negatively related to life expectancy but only total grant aid is significant in explaining mortality rate. While neither multilateral aid nor total grant aid is significant in explaining real per capita income in the Nigerian  economy.

          Vu Minh Duc (2008) in his research on foreign aid and economic growth in the developing countries based his model on the endogenous growth theory as developed by Barro (1991) and this incorporated foreign aid as an additional explanatory variable, he studied 39 countries, 5 countries from East Asia, 3 from South Asia, 2 from Europe and Central Asia, 13 from Latin America and the Caribbean, 5 from the Middle East and North Africa and 11 from Sub-Saharan Africa. Using sub periods 1975 and 1992 – 2000 as well as the overall period from 1975 – 2000 he noticed that economic growth in developing countries has a negative relation with foreign aid and it is highly insignificant. He further argued that in countries where the institutional environment is distorted, aid could be fungible into financing governments consumption instead of being effectively invested.

          Fayissa and El-Kaissy (1999) in a study of 77 countries over sub periods 1971 -1 980, 1980-1990, and 1971 – 1990, show that foreign aid positively affects economic growth in developing countries. Using modern economic growth theories, they point out that foreign aid, domestic savings, human capital and export are positively correlated with economic growth in the studied countries.
          Pederson (1996) assets that it is not possible to conclude that aid affects growth positively. Using game theory, he argues that the problem lies in the built-in incentive of the aid system itself. The aid conditionality is not sufficient and penalties are not hard enough when recipient countries deviate from their commitment. In fact, he argues that there are incentives for aid donating agencies to disburse as much aid as possible. This he says hinders the motivation of recipient countries and raises the aid dependency, which in turn distorts their development.

          A recent research by Furuoka (2008) studied the determinants of aid allocation, which he adopted Arellano and Bond Generalized Method of Moment (GMM) type of estimator for 152 developing countries for the period 2000-2005. The empirical findings revealed a complex nature of foreign aid allocation with a dynamic panel model, but the static panel model indicated that aid donors tended to provide larger amounts of foreign to poorer countries. The study specifically examined four determinants vis-à-vis: gross national product per capita, total debt services, net barter terms of trade and total population of recipient countries.
          Burnside and Dollar (2000) studied the interactions among choice of macroeconomic policies and growth and revealed that aid is beneficial to countries that adopt appropriate and stable policies. However, the study revealed no evidence that foreign aid encourages the adoption of good macroeconomic policies. The study then showed that foreign aid is a waste to counties without appropriate and stable domestic policies. 

          Akonor (2008) examined foreign aid impact to Africa using theoretical and descriptive quantitative analyses revealed that aid is not a panacea for Africa’s development woes. He said foreign aid has so far created a welfare continent mentality and has become the hub around which the spokes of most African economies turn. The study further stated that dependency on foreign aid has compromised the sovereignty of African countries and that it is very unfortunate that aid has taken >50% of Sub-Saharan African countries’ budgets and 70% of their public investment.

          Singh (1985) examined the impact of interventionist state policy on economic growth. The study using cross-sectional OLS method revealed that both the savings rate and the rate of foreign aid were positive and significant. However, when an index of state intervention was introduced into the model, foreign aid became insignificant. With savings as the response variable, foreign aid was negative and significant when the index of state intervention was introduced into the model.

          Ahmed and Ahmed (2002) studied the impact of foreign capital inflow on domestic saving in Pakistan by applying three variants of co-integration techniques to time series data for the 1972-2000 periods. The study revealed in every case a valid long run relationship among the variables. The three variants of co-integration technique also revealed an inverse relationship between saving rate and foreign capital inflows and short run relationship between these two variables was also found to be negative.

          Salop et al (2007) evaluate in the context of continuing debate about the role of the IMF in aid to low income countries, what and how well, the IMF has done on aid to Sub-Saharan Africa. The study focuses on the IMF policy and practice in operations supported by the Poverty Reduction and Growth  Facility (PRGF), being the IMF’s main instrument for operational work in low income countries during the 1999-2005 review periods. The study finds that PRGF-supported macroeconomic policies generally accommodate the use of incremental aid in countries whose recent policies have led to high stocks of reserves and low inflation; in other countries additional aids are programmed to be saved to increase reserve or to retire domestic debt. It also finds that IMF communications on aid and poverty reduction have contributed to do more on aid mobilization and poverty reduction analysis.

          Finally, most studies on poverty make use of monetary poverty measures such as head count. However, to measure poverty effectively, there is need to go beyond money metric measures and employ multi-dimensional approach in which income and non-income indicators of poverty are used to asses the impact of foreign aid in Nigeria.
READ MORE ON FOREIGN AID

·   PRESENTATION OF REGRESSION RESULTS AND ANALYSIS GOTTEN FROM THE IMPACT OF FOREIGN AID ON POVERTY IN NIGERIA

·   RESEARCH METHODOLOGY OF THE IMPACT OF FOREIGN AID ON POVERTY IN NIGERIA - AFRICA

·   RESEARCH METHODOLOGY OF THE IMPACT OF FOREIGN AID ON POVERTY IN NIGERIA - AFRICA

·   EMPIRICAL LITERATURE OF IMPACT OF FOREIGN AID ON POVERTY IN NIGERIA

·   THEORETICAL LITERATURE REVIEW OF THE IMPACT OF FOREIGN AID ON POVERTY IN NIGERIA

·   IMPACT OF FOREIGN AID ON POVERTY IN NIGERIA

Share on Google Plus

Declaimer - Unknown

The publications and/or documents on this website are provided for general information purposes only. Your use of any of these sample documents is subjected to your own decision NB: Join our Social Media Network on Google Plus | Facebook | Twitter | Linkedin

READ RECENT UPDATES HERE