The words “human rights have a definitional problem. Many jurists and human rights activist have tried without generally acceptable success to evolve at precise and comprehensive definition. Any discussion on human rights issues raises emotion. As long as the phrase “human right” remains more definition would so long remain varied and inaccurate.

          The concept of human rights arises from the intrinsic nature of man. He is a human being endowed by God with certain inalienable rights. As a complete whole he alone stands for and he alone is responsible for his actions. He is equal to his next-door neighbor1.
          The notion of the in alienable rights of man remains with us today and a local expression of it was kindly put across by Eso J.S.C. when he declared what a fundamental rights is in the case of Ransom Kuti v Attorney General of the Federation2  (1985) 2 NWLR (part 6) 211 CA, as “a right which stands above the ordinary laws of the land and which is antecedent to the political society. It is a pre-condition to civilized existence. Cranston, gave what many people regard as a better definition of human rights when he wrote that;
          “Human right is something of which no one may be deprived without great affront to justice. There are certain deeds which should never be done, certain freedoms which should never be invaded, something’s which are supremely sacred3.
          According to Dowrick, human rights are; those claims made by men, for themselves or on behalf of other men, supported by some theory which concentrates on the humanity of man, on man as a human being a member of human kind4.
Also, Prof. Osita Eze defines human rights as:
          As representing demand or claims which individuals or groups make on society, some of which are protected by law and have become part of lex lata, while others remain aspirations to be attained in the future5.
          According to Okpara, Okpara human rights “are the universally accepted principles and rules that support morality and that make it possible for each member of the human family to realize his or her full potential and to live life in an atmosphere of freedom justice and peace6.
          Human rights according to, Eseni Azu Udu could be defined “as those rights or claims that are inherent man. Therefore associated with the nature of man7.
          Furthermore, the HELSINKI ACT defines human right as “the right to be free from governmental violations of the integrity of the person, the right to the fulfillment of such vital needs as food, shelter, health care and education, and the right to enjoy civil and political liberties8.
          The very specificity of the concept of “human rights” is that they belong to the individual in his quality as a human being who cannot be deprived of his substance in any circumstances. Human rights are thus intrinsic to the human condition9.
          Human rights further refer to the concept that every member of the human race has a set of basic claims by virtue of his or her humanness10.

          The principles of equality and non-discrimination represent the twin pillars upon which the whole edifice of the modern international law of human rights is established.
          Equality and non-discrimination are in themselves controversial terms with immense uncertainly as to their precise scope and content.
          Thus to one authority ‘equality is a notion exposed to different philosophical interpretations, it’s meaning in the various legal system is not always the same11.
Secondly, there is a substantial debate as to the means of creating real and meaningful equality. Thirdly, it is important to note the various definitions of equality and discrimination according to international conventions. Article 2 of the women’s convention represents what has been aptly describe as the core of the convention,12 According to this article state parties condemn discrimination against women in all forms and agree to eliminate discriminations. The agreement is to eliminate discriminations ;by all appropriate means and without delay.
          Such forms of discrimination has defined in Article 1, of CEDAW13  the term discrimination against women” shall mean any distinction, exclusion or restriction made on the basis of sex which has the effect or purpose of impairing or nullifying the recognition, enforcement or exercise by women, irrespective of their marital status, on a basis of equality of men and women of human right fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural civil or any other field.
          Discrimination is defined as differential treatment, especially a failure to treat all persons equally when no reasonable distinctions can be found between those favored and those not favored14.
          It can also be defined as the practice of treatment a particular group less fairly than others15.
          The constitution16 provides in section 42 that a citizen of Nigeria of a particular community, ethnic group, place of origin, sex, religion or political opinion shall not, by reason only that he is such a person
          Other relevant constitutional provision were made under chapter 2, titled fundamental objectives and directive principles of state policy, these provisions in chapter 2 are however non-justifiable. They include section 17 (9) which guarantees equality of rights, obligations and opportunities before the law and section 17 (3) (9) which ensures that all citizens, without discrimination on any group whatsoever shall have the opportunity for securing adequate livelihood as well as adequate opportunity to secure suitable employment.
          Furthermore it should be noted that the convention states that the full and complete development of a country, the welfare of the world and the cause of peace require the maximum participation of women on equal terms with men in all fields16.
          The human rights of women and of the girl child are an inalienable, integral and inadmissible part of universal human rights. The full and equal participation of women in political, civil, economic, social and cultural life, at the national, regional and international levels, and eradication of all forms of discrimination on grounds of sex are priority objectives of the international community17.
          On equality, the World conference on human rights argues the full and equal enjoyment by women of all human rights and that this be a priority for governments and for the United Nations.
          Furthermore, it underlines the importance of the integration and full participation of women as both agents and beneficiaries in he developmental process, and reiterates the objectives established on global action for women towards sustainable and equitable development set forth in the RIO declaration on environment and development and chapter of Agenda twenthy one -18
          It is imperative to reiterate that human rights pertains to those rights that every human being possesses and is entitled to enjoy simply by virtue of being human. These rights are predicted on the fundamental principle that all persons possess an inherent human dignity and that they are entitled too enjoy these rights regardless of sex, color, language, national origin, age, class or religious or political beliefs. Therefore, human rights apply to both man and women equally19.
          Basically, women’s human rights are those rights that apply to both women, and men, and are contained in general human rights instruments t with: the international convent on civil and political rights (ICCPR) the international covenant on economic, social and cultural rights, (ICESR) among  others, which entrench rights exercisable by all without discrimination of any form20.
          There are also some those that are specific to women or those that need to be enlarged to suit women’s situations. Such rights are found in specialized instruments like the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women (CEDAW) yet, there are some others that are still evolving. This category of rights is yet to be defined and included comprehensively in the general human rights instruments for instance, some reproductive rights of women21
          At the evolution of the human rights system, the focus of human rights was on civil and political rights rather than economic, social and cultural rights that have prevailing influence on women.
          The issue of the rights of women remains highly derisive in most societies and regions of the world. Those divisions are reflected in the developing norms of the international law of human rights. Discriminating practices and violations of the rights of women are historical as well as a contemporary phenomenon22.
          Gender equality was neither promoted by religious ideologies, nor was it advocated by philosophers of the enlightenment. It is ironic that in the great resolutions in France, the United States and Russia, champions of equality had a limited vision on matters of women’s right and gender-based equality23.
          Women face discrimination, intimidation, harassment, torture and physical abuse not simply by state organs but also by their own family and other non-state organs. A major problem which has led to a regular impact on the position of women is the reluctance of international human rights law to intervene in what is perceived as private (as opposed to the public matters24. Attempts to combat discrimination and violence against women in the private domain have raised substantial opposition. Intrusion into private and family life is not revealed as desirable for law enforcement bodies.
          In most cases such intrusion are seen as contrary to cultural, religious and social values prevalent in many societies25. Within the sanctity of the home, women, in many parts of the world, are regularly subjected to mental and physical violence, or sexual abuse of the nature of incest, rape, ‘dowry deaths’, wife battering, genital mutilation, prostitution and forced sterilization26. In social structures like the aforementioned women undergo a persisted cycle of rejection, subordination and shame in most cases from their husbands. Women face multiple disadvantages based on the grounds such as race, religion, national and social origin27.
          Although it is encouraging to note that the United Nations has undertaken positive steps to combat discrimination against women. The United Nations convention on the Elimination of all forms of discrimination against women, it’s focus prohibits discrimination in “any other field”.28
          Although difficulties have arisen in enforcing the norm of non-discrimination in the domestic or private sphere such difficulties are apparent in the large number of reservations to significant provisions contained in the convention, e.g. Article 16 Women and girls are frequent targets of violence and sexual humiliation in times of war and conflict, conflicts such as those in the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda graphically reflects the targeted rape of women from the opposing religious or ethnic grouping as a war tactic. As the trial chamber of ICTR in the trial of Jean Paul Akayesu29.

          The United Nations charter contains a number of references providing for gender equality and non-discrimination. According to Article 1 (3) of the charter one of the purposes of the United Nations is
          “To achieve international co-operation in solving international        problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian          character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without   distinction as to sex.
          Soon after the establishment of the United Nations, the United Nations’ Economic and Social Council, in accordance with Article 68 of the charter, setup a commission on the status of women (CSW), CSW is one of the nine ECOSOC functional commissions30.The CSW was established as a functional commission of the ECOSOC to prepare recommendations and reports for the council on promoting women’s rights in political economic, art and educational fields31.
          The commission also makes recommendations to the council on urgent problems requiring immediate attention in the field of women’s rights. The object of the commission is to promote the implementation of the principle that men and women shall have equal rights. Its mandate was expanded in 1987 by the council in its resolution 1987/22.
          Following the 1995 fourth World Conference on women, the general assembly mandated the commission to integrate into its work programme a follow up processes to the conference in which the commission should play a significant role regularly reviewing the critical areas of concern in the platform for Action. EISOSOC resolution 1996/6/6 additionally altered the terms of reference of CSW by broadening its mandate to include “emerging issues, affecting equality between women and men”.
          The commission, which initially began with 15 members, now consists of 45 members elected by the Economic and Social Council for a period of four years. Members who are appealed by governments, are elected on the following basis; 13 from African States, 11 from Asian States, four from Eastern European States, nine from Latin American States and Caribbean States, and eight from Western European and other states. The commission meets normally on an annual basis for a period of eight working days.
          The status of the members of the CSW resembled that of the former commission on human rights (in the sense that members act as representatives of states rather than in their personal capacity) and as in the case of the human rights commission the course of the proceedings and their outcome reflected the governmental stance on human rights issues32 unlike the former human rights commission, the CSW has not been able to develop its role much further than promotional educational and standard-setting activities. Indeed, for sometime the future of the CSW remained under threat and there has been a pronounced resistance to the idea of expanding the scope and authority of CSW to receive and consider petitions similar in nature to those received under ECOSOC 1503 procedure33.  The specifically of the work of CSW, with an exclusive focus of women’s human rights also generated some concern, and as we shall notice in due course there have been attempts to maintain gender equally.
          Notwithstanding its limitations the CSW should be accredited and commended for its contribution to establishing new standard setting mechanisms. A number of international connections were formulated under the sponsorship of CSW including the 1952 convention on the political rights of women,34 the 1957 convention on the Nationality of Married Women35 and the 1962 convention on consent to marriage, minimum Age for marriage and Registration of Marriages36 the most significant achievement of the commission remains its role in the drafting of the convention on the elimination of forms of discrimination against women (1979)37 The convention was the culmination of more than thirty years of work by the United Nations commission of the status of women (CSW).
          Among International human rights, treaties, the convention takes an important place in bringing the female right of humanity into the focus of human rights concerns.
          The contemporary women’s right movement on the other hand, is shaped by various factors including the emergence of the UN human rights system. The UN human right system emerged at the very foundation of the UN itself in 1945. These foundations of the UN human rights system preceded the Emergence the women’s rights movement and this explains why women were essentially excluded from the process of defining the rights and creating the evolving structures for monitoring and enforcing the rights.

          The convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women and hereafter the women’s convention) was adopted by the general Assembly of the United Nations on 18 December 1979 and came into force on 3rd September 1981. The declaration on the Elimination of All forms of discrimination against women was adopted in 1967. it constitutes a comprehensive attempt at establishing Universal standards on the rights of women the convention is one of the widely ratified human rights treaties, and can be regarded   as a milestone towards reaching the goal of standard-setting for gender-based equality. In the preamble to the convention, the state parties acknowledge the fact that “extensive discrimination against women continues to exist”38 the preamble also acknowledges the detrimental effect that discrimination has on the development of nations, thereby linking gender equality with development. The family as well as the society is hampered by the denial of women’s full and adequate participation in the political, economic, social, legal and cultural activities. Significantly, within the preamble there is the recognition of a link between gender-based discrimination and exploitation for political and economic goal. The convention is an international human rights document that establishes the universality of the principle of equality of rights between men and women, and amongst women inter se39. The convention establishes an independent expect body, the committee on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women made up of twenty three individuals to monitor the implementation of the convention the General Assembly further adopted an optional protocol to the convention. This protocol permits the committee to receive and consider communications from women or group of women who alleges that they are victims of gender discrimination within the jurisdiction of state parties to the protocol. The protocol was adopted on October 6, 1999 and entered into force on December 22, 2000 [40].
          Noting the adverse impact of harmful cultural practices and traditions on the status of women, the preamble of CEDAW rightly points to the following….A change in the traditional role of men and as well as the role of women in society and into family is needed to achieve full equality of men and women” therefore, CEDAW strongly targets cultural patterns that define roles for sexes especially in the provisions affirming the equal rights and equal responsibilities of both sexes in family life41 in respect of the above, state parties to the convention have the obligation to endeavor towards the modification of social and  cultural patterns of individual conduct in order to eliminate:
          “Prejudices and customs and all other practices which are based on the role of the inferiority or the superiority of either of the sexes or on stereotyped roles from42” it is important to note that the convention does not expressly include the expression “violence against women”. This is a reflection of the fact that at a time the convention was drafted the issue of violence against women was not regarded as a significant issue on the international agenda. It was through the COMMITTEE’S GENERAL RECOMMENDATION 12 AND 19, respectively dated 1989 and 1992, (which would be discussed in details later) that this omission was corrected.
          The committee recommended that state parties should adopt measures addressing gender-based violence as well as report on such measure.
          Nevertheless, the convention, provides a comprehensive framework for challenging the various forces that have created and sustained discrimination based upon sex, therefore, indirectly providing a framework for addressing gender-based violence43.

          The provisions of the convention spans a broad spectrum of political, cultural, legal, health, and socio economic and educational rights of women. A total of 130 countries have ratified or acceded to it and Nigeria is one of them. Nigeria ratified it in 1985 [44]. The first 16 article of the convention spells out the substantive provisions of the convention which can be classified as follows;45
Article 1: Definition of discrimination.
Article 2-3, legal and policy measures to eliminate discrimination and advance women’s equality to repeal all national penal provisions which constitute discrimination against women.
          The provisions of Article 2 are particularly valuable in identifying and establishing a regime of non-discrimination and gender equality. As we shall see in due course, the women’s convention has started dealing with individual communications under the optional protocol to the convention.
Article 4: Affirmative action for practical advancement of women’s status, to enshrine the principle of equality of men and women in their national laws and to ensure the practical realization of this principle, to establish legal protection of the equal rights of women through national tribunals or other public institutions.
Article 5: Sex stereotypes; to modify the social and cultural patterns of conduct of men and women which are based on the idea of inferiority or the superiority of either of the sexes or on stereotyped roles for men and women. India is one of the states which has made a declaration in relation to Article 5 (a) represent ting tension, and male hegemony within the society. The Indian declaration notes:
“With regards to articles (5a) - - - of the convention on the         Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination India declares that      it shall abide by and ensure these provisions in conformity    with   its policy of non-interference in the personal affairs of    any community without its initiative and consent”.
          Other states that have entered reservations to Article 5 (a) are Niger 46  Malaysia,47 and New Zealand-Cook Island.48
          In addition to the practices of female genital mutilation and polygamous marriages the committee has expressed its concern over a range of approaches. There are however, practices over which it has not been possible to formulate and firm views, it is debatable for example, whether such practices as wearing of headscarves as compulsory discs code to ensure women’s modesty contravenes the provisions of this article. Conversely, it remains highly problematic, the approach adopted in several states whereby there is a banning of headscarves for women or other religious symbolism in educational institutions or other public institutions49. in the case of LEYLA SAHIM V TURKEY 50, the European court of Human Rights did not find a violation of Article 9 of the European convention of Human rights when the Turkish state had denied access to university facilities to a female medical student vehicle wearing the hijab (the headscarf) in accordance with her religious convictions. In a further disappointing  stance, the United Kingdom’s house of Lords held that insistence on wearing a jilbab because of enhanced covering for women was rather a right recognized under Article 9 of the European court of human right, nor was that a pre-requisite for establishing an Islamic right to identity. The role and stance which is increasingly being adopted by overzealous courts raise tensions; the potential for conflict remains over the right to manifest one’s religious beliefs vis-à-vis Article 5 of the women’s convention.
Article 6; Trafficking and exploitation of women to take all appropriate measures including legislation to suppress all forms of traffic in women and exploitation of prostitution of women51. In condemning such activities it requires state parties to take all appropriate steps to steps to end trafficking in women and exploitation and prostitution of women. In its General Recommendation 19, the convention has noted that poverty and unemployment as well as armed conflicts encourage for such activities as trafficking in women and the committee has also expressed concern at the newer forms of exploitation, sex tourism, exploitation, of migrant women workers and marriages of women from poorer countries with foreign and wealthier men from developed states. In order to combat the evil trafficking of women, the international community has adopted a number of specific international instruments. These include the convention for the suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of others 1949 [52]
Article 7 and Article 8 Provision for political and Public Life for women. State Parties are required to take all appropriate measures to Eliminate discrimination against women in political and public life53. This Article attempts to ensure that women have a right to vote, and have a right to be elected to office with participating rights in policy formulation, at all the governmental levels. Majority of state accord equality to women in public life there remain unfortunate remnants of legislature enactments and administrative policies barring women from political participation at the governmental level. Examples of discrimination practices could be found in state laws excluding women from public offices, exclusion from voting rights for example the position of Saudi Arabia, and exclusion from religious courts, the position in Israel.
          The convention has shown concern on the low level of women in public offices and women in ministerial post it has elaborated on the provisions of the convention through its General recommendation No. 23 (1997) on women in political and public life54.
          According to Article 8, state farmers are under an obligation to take all appropriate measures to ensure that women have the opportunity to represent their government at international levels.
It is General Recommendation on the Implementation of Article 8, the committee notes that:
State parties take further direct measures in accordance with Article of the convention to ensure the full implementation of Article 8 of the convention and ensure that women are on equal terms with men and without any discrimination the opportunities to represent their government at the international level and to participate in the work of international organizations55.
Article 9: Right to Nationality; the Article emphasizes equal rights for women in acquiring changing and nationality-state parties are require to ensure that “Neither marriage to an alien nor change of nationality by the husband during marriage shall automatically change the nationality of the wife, neither should as are suit of such marriage render her stateless or impose on her the nationality of the husband”56
Article 10: women frequently suffer from in equality of opportunities in Education and national and professional training. The issue prevalent in Nigeria and the girl education is looked upon as a waste of resources whereby girls are supposed to be trained only to become dutiful wives and mothers, the convention attempts to eradicate such discrimination.
Article 11: Deals with elimination of discrimination at the workplace and in the field of employment. The Article recognizes the right to work as an inalienable right of all human beings states parties undertake to adopt all appropriate measures to ensure equal opportunities in employment and to provide a free choice of profession and security and a right to protection of health and to safety in working conditions.
          According to Article 11 (2) state undertake to prohibit dismissal on grounds inter-alia of pregnancy. In particular, pregnancies must not constitute an obstacle to employment and should not constitute justification for loses of employment. Lastly emphasis should be placed on the link between the fact that women often have less access to education than men and certain traditional cultures which compromise the opportunities for the employment and advancement of women57.
Article 12: of the convention deals with the important subject of equality in healthcare, including family planning assistance. In General recommendation 24, CEDAW has urged state parties to report on their health legislation and policies for women. They are required to provide information on health conditions, conditions hazardous to the health of women and on related diseases. This includes the measures taken in order to eliminate female genital mutilation and about the efforts of HIV/AIDS on the situation of women.
Article 13: Represents important provisions related to economic and social rights. It emphasis equality of rights, particularly the right to family benefits, the right to bank loans, mortgages, other forms of financial credit and the right to participation in recreational activities.
          Women often suffer from inequalities to obtain benefits, loans and credit from governmental agencies, banks and building societies. The provisions of the Article aim, interalia, to prevent sex discrimination in the payment of social security’s and similar benefits.
          In Broeks v Netherlands,58 MS Broeks appealed to the Human Rights committee under the first optional protocol claiming violations of Article 26 of ICCPR and Article 9 in conduction with Article 2 and 3 of ICESCR. Mrs. Broeks was dismissed by her employer because of illness. At first, she received payments as unemployment benefits, but the Dutch government discontinued these since she was not the breadwinner in her household as was required by the Netherlands unemployment Benefit Act. The human Rights Committee found violations of Article 26 of ICCPR, because the statute was discriminating in its treatment of women vis-a vis men, and no grounds could be ascertained to justify such as distinction between men and women.
Article 14 [59] deals with the specific position of rural women.
          State parties shall take into account the particular problems faced by rural women and the significant roles which they play in the economic survival of their families including their work in the non-monetized sectors of the economy, and shall take all appropriate measures to ensure the application of the provisions of the present convention to women in rural areas.
1.       State parties are expected to take the following measures to eliminate discrimination against rural women.
a.       To participate in the elaboration of and implementation of    development planning at all levels.
b.       To have access to adequate health care facilities, including     information counselling and services in family planning.
c.       To benefit directly from social security programmes
d.       To obtain all types of training and education, formal and non-        formal, including that relating to function at literacy, as well        as, inter-alia, the benefit of all community and extension    services, in order to increase their technical proficiency.
e.       To organize self help groups and co-operatives in order to     obtain equal access to economic opportunities through       employment or self employment
f.       To participate in all community activities
g.       To have access to agricultural credit and loans, marketing     faculties, appropriate technology and equal treatment in land      and agrarian reform as well as in land resettlement schemes
h.       To enjoy adequate living conditions particularly in relation to         housing sanitation, electricity and water supply, transport and         communications.
Article 15: Equality before the law in matters of civil law must be accorded to women, including the legal capacity to contract, to own and to administer property, to move and to choose a residence and domicile.
          Under this Article states parties are obliged to ensure the conformity of their national legislation with this rule. In addition, any contract or legal document whose effect is directed at restricting the legal capacity of women to contract.
          There have been complex issues emerging particularly from property and land rights, and inheritance, with reliance being placed on customary laws or religious values to justify the refusal to bring about equality of treatment.
          Women are in many traditions and cultures excluded or denied equal distribution of property or land upon divorce or death of a partner such practices have been the object of criticism by the convention. In General Recommendation 40/21 on Equality in marriage and family Nations, the convention notes that law which grant  men a larger share upon divorce are discriminating.
          In the case of ERUWA v ERUWA, 60 The High Court held that an unmarried women is entitled as of right to the portion given to her by her father,, or property that is partitioned that devolves on her by inhentance. Furthermore, in the case of CHINWEZE V MASI 61,  the issue was whether the property in dispute was part of the estate of the late Mrs. Elizabeth Chinweze and could thus be inhented by her children. In this case, the children of the deceased died intestate, the interest in No.5 Ogui Road Enugu did not ensure to her estate but instead, it accrued to her half sister as the surviving joint tenant, the supreme court held that under customary law, a wife has only a lifee interest in the property of her husband.
Article 16; Provides for Marriage ands family relations; state parties agree to undertake all appropriate measures to Eliminate discrimination against women in all matters relating to marriage and family relations.
          Assurances are provided by states that men and women shall have the same right to enter into marriage, the same right to freely choose a spouse and to enter into marriage only with their and full consent. In the case of MOJEKWU v EJIKEME, 62 the Nrachi Nwanyi custom which enables a man to keep one of his daughters unmarried perpetually under his roof to raise issues especially males, to succeed him was before the court for determination.
          The court of Appeal, overruling the decision of the lower court, held that the Nrachi custom of Nnewi is inconsistent with public policy, repugnant to natural justice, equality and good conscience.
          According to Article 16 (2) ‘the betrothal and the marriage of a child shall have no legal effect, and all necessary actions, including legislation, shall be taken to specify a minimum age per marriage and to make the registration of marriages in an official registry compulsory.
          In General Recommendation 21, CEDAW notes that an examination of state parties report discloses that there are countries which, on the basis of custom, religious beliefs or the ethnic origins of particular groups of people permit forced marriages or remarriages. 63
          There has also been an alarming rate of Reservation by state parties, particularly regarding Article 2. These reservations often state that compliance with the provisions may conflict with a commonly held vision of the family based, inter alia, on cultural or religious beliefs or on the country’s economic or political status.
          The viewpoints of the state representatives and the state reports reveal that the rights contained in this Article conflict directly with existing cultural and religious norms. While many Islamic states questions the compatibility of the Sharia, vis-à-vis the provisions of Article 16, Islamic states are by no means the only ones to have entered reservations.

          Part V, Article 17 of the convention establishes the committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against women (CEDAW), a body of 23 experts. CEDAW is elected by state parties with individual members to serve in their personal capacity.
          The committee is elected by state parties for four-year terms. CEDAW members are required to be of high moral standing and competence in field covered by the convention.64
          Historically the convention committee secretariat, unlike other treaty-based committees, was not provided by the office of the high commission of Human Right. However, as of 1 January 2009 all responsibility for servicing the convention has been shifted to the office of the high commissioner for human rights.65 Like the human Rights committee and the Economic, social and cultural Rights committee, expenses of the convention are borne from the UN budget, prior to 1994 the committee used to meet in New York and although the New York sessions were much more publicized. Since its 13th session in 1994, the committee’s sessions have mostly been held in New York. However, as noted above, in January 2008 the secretariat of the convention moved to Geneva, which has allowed a greater number of sessions to be hold in Geneva.66
          According to Article 20, the committee is required to meet for a period of not more than two weeks, every year. However, the rapid expansion of the state membership meant that more time was needed to consider state reports. In the light of unexpected workload, the General Assembly since 1990 has also allowed the committee to meet on an exceptional basis for an extra one week per year. The sessional meeting of the committee has been held on January and June of each year.
          However, in 2008 the committee held three sessions due to the General Assembly in Resolution 62/2/8 having extended the meeting time and for 2008/2009.
          State representatives are engaged in what the committee calls constructive dialogue. This allows the experts to question Government delegates wi0th regards to both the legal and practical position of implementation endeavours in that country. However, a fair assessment of the situation of affairs is not possible without alternative information from NGO’s and other United Nations Agencies.
          Through the committee various issues like violence, acid attacks forced marriages trafficking and among others were, brought under state responsibility to prevent, prosecution and punishment. Through these women groups gained the needed impetus that enable them campaign successfully at the World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna, for the recognition of violence against women as a violation of their human rights, a right not expressly provided for in the original text of the convention.
          These efforts led to the appointment of special Rapporteur on violence against women in 1994 67. The new special rapporteur is Rhadika Coomaraswamy from Sri Lanka. Her functions include inter alia consulting and liaising with other UN agencies, Human Rights treaties bodies especially the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women and the CSW. In her fact finding functions she can receive allegations directly though she cannot investigate them, she can ask governments to respond to such allegations. Her mandate touches on issues such as wife battery, female genital mutilation, rape, special and religious laws affecting women which are all prevalent in Nigeria.
          Only recently, the United Nations Commission on Human Rights appointed Rukiya Hussien-Aden as the focal point for women at the centre for human Rights in Geneva Switzerland.
          Until recently the convention has not had a judicial or Quasi-judicial function. Its sole task, previously was reviewing the state reports but this has changed significantly since the optional protocol came into operation. The committee’s main task was one of implementing the convention, an exercise, thus far, conducted within the framework of reporting procedures68.
          Finally, it is important to note that the task of monitoring implementation of the convention is entrusted in the committee on the Elimination of discrimination against women (CEDAW).


SIGNATURE: This occurs when a state party gives its consent to the text of the treaty by signature in defined circumstances noted by the article. Where the treaty provides that signature shall take effect through consent, or where it is otherwise established that the negotiating state had agreed that signature should have that effect, or where the intention of the state to give, that effect to the signature appears from the full powers of its representative or was expressed during the negotiations.
          Although consent by ratification is probably the most popular of the methods adopted in practice, consent by signature does retain some significance, especially in light of the fact that to insist upon ratification in each case before a treaty becomes binding is likely to burden the administrative machinery of government and result in long delays. Accordingly, provision is made for consent to be expressed by signature.
          The act of signature is usually a very formal affair. Often in the more important treaties, the head of state will formally add his signature in an elaborate ceremony. In multilateral conventions a special closing session will be held at which authorized representatives will sign the treaty.
          However, where the convention is subject to acceptance, approval or ratification, signature will become a mere formality and will mean no more than that, the state representatives have agreed upon an acceptable text, which will be forwarded to their particular government for the necessary decision as to acceptance or rejection69.

RATIFICATION; The device of ratification by the competent authorities of the state is historically well established and was originally devised to ensure that the representative did not exceed his powers or functions with regards to the making of a particular agreement. Although ratification (or approval) was in years past a function of the sovereign, it has in modern times been made subject to constitutional control.
          The advantages of waiting until a state ratifies a treaty before it becomes a binding document are basically two fold, internal and external. In the letter case, the delay between signature and ratification may often be advantageous in allowing extra time for consideration, once the negotiating process has been completed.
          By providing for ratification, the feelings of public opinion have an opportunity to be expressed with the possibility that a strong negative reaction may result in the state deciding not to ratify the treaty under consideration.
          In some cases, signature to treaties may be declared subject to acceptance or approval.70

ACCESSION: This is the normal methods by which a state becomes a party to a treaty it has not signed. Consent by accession is possible where the treaty so provides, or the negotiating states agree or subsequently agree that consent by accession could occur in the case of the state in question.
          Important multilateral treaties often declare that specific entities may accede to the treaty at a later date. For instance, the 1958 Geneva conventions on the sea provided for accession by any member states of the United Nations or any of the specialized Agencies of the United Nations.71
          The implication of accession is that it carries the same force with ratification. A newly independent state may, by means of a declaration of succession, express the desire to remain bound by the treaty which applied to its former territory. It may also make a declaration of provisional application of the treaty while examining them prior to accession or succession by her legislature.

RESERVATION: A state may make reservations in order to exclude or modify the legal effect of certain provisions of the treaty, such reservations must not run contrary to the essential principle of the convention72.  This means that where a state is satisfied with most of a treaty but is unhappy about one or two particular provisions, it may, in certain circumstances, wish to refuse to accept or be bound by such provisions, while consenting to the rest of the agreement for example, the significant number of reservations on the convention on the Elimination Against all forms of discrimination against women (CEDAW) which include not just religious grounds, but also as in the case of the United States, constitutional practices protecting private sphere. Further noted cwas reservations to article (2) of the Women’s convention – the core norm of obligation of the convention is regarded as challenging to the convention.
          The capacity of state to make reservations to an international treaty illustrates the principle of sovereignty of states, whereby a state may refuse its consent to particular provisions so that they do not become binding upon it. On the other hand, of course, to permit a treaty to become honey combed with reservations by series of countries could well jeopardize the whole exercise. It could seriously dislocate the whole purpose of the agreement and lead to the some complicated inter-relationships amongst states.

SUCCESSION: If a state changes its personality so as to become a different state, international law may in some circumstances treat the different state as a successor state. A successor state is a legal continuation of the pervious state, bearing the same rights and duties as its predecessor.
          Therefore, the continuation or the clean slate principle was as a result of the various forms by which succession can be achieved.
          Therefore, the ‘clean state’ principle has been applied to ensure that states emerging from colonial rule are not bound by unwanted treaties trust upon them by their previous rulers.
          Thus a common practice has been for such state to lodge a declaration with the Secretary General of the UN acknowledging the provisional communication of application of treaties until the new state informs the depositary of the definitive position. Since treaties are based on consent, it is understandable that in such situations bilateral arrangements are generally open to negotiation as desired. For example, the coalescence of North and South Yemen was more an allegation of equals. Hence treaties would continue to apply to the successor state, at least in respect of the respective former parts of the territory where a territorial effect was involved73.

          The optional protocol came into force on 22nd December 2000 very often human rights treaties are followed by “optional protocol” which may either provide for procedures with regard to the treaty or address a substantive area related to the treaties. Optional protocol to human rights treaties are treaties in their own right and are open to signature, accession or ratification by countries who are party to the main treaty.
The optional protocol to CEDAW includes:
          The communication procedures: it gives individual and groups the right to complain to the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women when their rights have been violated. The complaint however must be in a written form.
The inquiry procedure;
1)                It enables the Committee on the convention to conduct          inquires into grave abuse by parties to the Optional Protocol
2)                It allows investigation of substantial abuses of Women’s       human right by an international body experts.
3)                It is useful where individual communications fail to reflect the         systematic nature of widespread violations to be investigated    where individual or groups may be unable to make           communications (for practical reasons or because of fear  of reprisals).
4)                It gives the Committee of the convention an opportunity to   make recommendations regarding the structural causes of     violations.
5)                It allows the Committee on the convention to address a broad         range of issues in a particular country.
          Until the entry into force of the Optional Protocol, the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women (CEDAW) was enforced in two ways.
The report procedure
          State parties have no submit a national report to the Committee within one year of accession or ratification of CEDAW and thereafter every four years or when the Committee requests for it.
The interstate procedure
          Article 29 states that two or more parties can refer disputes about the interpretation of CEDAW to arbitration, and if the dispute is not settled, it can be referred to the International Court of Justice.
Other ways in which Women’s right monitored by the United Nation include:
The CSW Communication Procedures
          The CSW can receive communications about discrimination against women.
Special Rapporteur on violence against women.
The special Rapporteur was appointed in 1994 by resolution 1994/45 of the Commission on Human Rights. They consider issues on violence against women; it established procedures to seek information from government concerning specific cases of alleged violence.
Essence of the optional protocol
1)                To improve on and add to existing enforcement mechanisms           for women’s human rights.
2)                To improve state’s individual understanding of the      convention. 
          Under the communication procedure, the Committee will be able to say what is required from states in individual          circumstances.
3)                To stimulate States to take steps to implement the convention.       The optional protocol should encourage states to implement   CEDAW to avoid complaints being made against them. The          possibility of complaints might also be an incentive for states         to provide more effective local remedies.
4)                To stimulate changes in discriminatory laws and practices. Under the Optional Protocol, the Committee would be able to request the state party concerned to take specific measures to           remedy violations of CEDAW. The request might include the          amendment of legislation, stopping discriminatory practices,     implementing affirmative action measures.
5)                To enhance existing mechanism for the implementation of     human rights within the United Nations system.
6)                To create greater public awareness of human rights standards         relating to discrimination against women.
          The Optional Protocol requires states to publicize it and its procedures. Communications and Inquiries under the Optional Protocol will receive publicity which will increase public awareness of CEDAW and the optional protocol. The Nigerian Government ratified the CEDAW convention in 1985 singed the Optional Protocol on the 8th of September 2000 and ratified and acceded to it on 22nd November, 2004. This means that they are meant to respect provisions of CEDAW and its optional protocol.

1 Okpara; O., Human Rights, law and Practice in Nigeria vol 1, Abakaliki, (Publicom International (NIg) Ltd, 2007) pg 40.
2  (1985) 2  NWLR (part 6) 211 CA
3Cranston, M. Human Right: Real and supposed in Raphael (ed) political theory and the Rights of man, Bloomington, 1967, p. 52.
4 Dawrick, F.E. (ed) Human Rights, problems, prospects and texts, West  mead, UK: Saxon House, 1979, pp 8-9
5 Eze; O. human right in Africa; selected problems (Lagos, Macmillan, 1984), p.5.
6 Okpara O. human rights, law and practice in Nigeria, Vol 1, Abakaliki, (Publicom International (Nig) Ltd, 2007) pg. 40
7 Udu; E.A. human rights in Africa, Lagos (Mbefi and Association (Nig) Ltd, 2001) pg 4.
8Helsinki is the capital of Finland, the Helsinki act is the final act of the conference, Helsinki on August 1, 1975 by the UnitedState of America, Canada and 33 other countries. See, Udu, E.A. OP, Cit P, 5.
9 International human rights law and the role of the legal profession: A general introduction, human rights in the administration of Justice, a publication of human rights library, University of Minnesota, available at http://human rights law. Law.monash.edu.au/monitoring/admchp4.htm/,visited on 21/6/2013.
10 Palley; C. The United Kingdom and human rights, (London; Sterens and sons and sweet and Maxwell, 1991) p. 51.
11 Loner group rights and discrimination, above n, 1  aat p. 30
12  U.N. DOC CEDAW/C/SR 35,
13 Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women
14 Garner; B.A. Black’s law dictionary, 7th edition
15Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary 6th Edition.
16 Section 42.
16  preamble to the convention on the elimination of All Forms of discrimination against women, 1979
17 Part 1 Para 18, Vienna Declaration and programme of Action, adopted following “United Nations World Conference on human rights”, Vienna, June 1993.
18 31.I.L.M. 814 (1992).
19 Udu; E.A. OP Cit pg 188
20 Scholar; M. and Flowers; N. women’s human rights; step by step facilitator’s guide, published by women, law and development international, units 1-3
21 Ibid.
22 Shuler (ed) freedom from violence women’s strategies from Around the World (1992)
23 Olumpede Gouge ‘The rights of women’ (Pythia, 1989), Robison (ed), Mary Shelley: collected Tales and stories (John Hopkins University Press, 1976)
24 Engle, after the collapse of the public/private distinction: strategizing women’s right in dallmeyer ce.d), Reconcieving reality: Women and International Law (American society of international law, 1993) at p 143.
25 Bryrnes, women, feminism and international human rights law: methodological myopia, fundamental flaws or meaningful marginalization’12 ayil (1988-89) p at 215.
26 See CEDAW, General Recommendation no 14 female circumcision (ninth session, 1990) UN doc A/45/38.
27 Human Rights committee General comment no28,para 30:www,unhchr.ch/doc.nsf(last visited 21st June 2013).
28 Article 1 convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (1979)
29 Prosecutor v Jean Paul Akayesu, Trial chamber, case no(ictr;96-4-7)Para 449. default.htm (last visited 21 June 2013)
30 Article 2, 3, 13, 137 and 141 treaty Establishing the European community as well as the draft of the European constitution
31 By its resolution 11 (11) of 21 June 1946
32 ECOSOC Res E/1979/36; Davidson, Human Rights (open university press, 1993) pg 21
33 Ibid.
34 193 United Nations, Treaty series 135 entered into force 7th July 1954.
35 309 United Nations Treaty series 65, entered into force 11 August 1958
36 521 United Nations Treaty series 231 entered into force 1964.
37 United Nations Treaty Series vol 1249 p, 13
38 The Preamble to the convention
39 Nwankwo; O. convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women (CEDAW) made simple, (Nigeria: peculiar instincts, 2004) p 6.
40 HUamn Rights in the Administratiiion of Justice, (A Publication of human rights Library, university of Minnesota, chapter 2, available at http://humanrights.law.monash.edu.au/monitoring.admchap2.htm/ Visited 21/06/2013.
41 Article 16 convention on the elimination against all forms of discrimination against women (CEDAW)
42 Article 5 (a) Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women (CEDAW)
43 Oyajobi,  A.V. human rights law and practice journal, vol 3 (1993) pg 9
44 Ibid
45 Assessing the status of women, law and public program, centre for population and family health (Columbia University, 1988) pg 48.
46Niger’s reservation states that “the government of Niger expresses reservations with regard to the modification of social and cultural pattern of conduct of men and women”
47Malaysia’s reservation is based upon the subject to the Sharia principles on division of inherited properties
48 The Cook island reserve the right not to apply Article 2 (f) and Article 5 (a) to the extent that customs governing the inheritance of certain cook Islam chieftaincy titles may be inconsistent with these provisions
49 Richard K. Garner International law (Pearson Education Limited) England 2003
50 (2007) 44 The European court of Human Rights.
51  It is on the strength of this provision that Nigeria enacted the Prohibition of Traffic in Persons Act, 2003
52 Convention for the suppression of the traffic in persons and of the exploitation of the prostitution of others 96 UNTS 271, entered into Force 25 July 1951
53  The Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women; Article 7 and 8; General Recommendation No 8 (Implementation of Article) in United Nations compilation of General comments p, 206
54 CEDAW. General Recommendation no 23 women in public and political life (16th session, 19979); www.un.org/womenwatch.daw/cedaw/recommendations/recomm.htm/recomm23 (last visited July 2013)
55 CEDAW, General recommendation No 8 Implementation of Article 8. UN. DOC A/43/38
56 Article 61)
57 David Rehman; International human rights law (Pearson education limited) England 2003/2010, pg 528; The Rehman; D. General comment, the committee on the economic, social and cultural rights the right to work, General comment NO 18 Adopted on 24 November 2005, E/C.12/GC/18.6 (6 February 2000) para 6 and 7.
58  Communication No/72/1984 (9  April 1987) UN Doc supp No 40 (A/42/40) at 239(1987).
59  Cook; women’in joyner (ed), United Nations and International Law (Cambridge University press 1997) pp 181-207 at p199
60  (2002) 4 R.C.H.R. 536.
61  (1989) 1 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 97) 254
62  (2002) 5 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 657) 403
63  CEDAW  General Recommendations No 21, Equality in Marriage and Family Relations www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/recommendations/recomm.htmrecomm 21 (last visited 25 June 2013) per) 16
64  Article 17 (1)
65  Release of information by the Division for the Advancement of Women (May 2009)
66  DAVID REHMAN, International human rights law; (Pearson education limited) England 2003, 2010, pg 538
67 Wallace; R, International human rights; Texts and Materials, (London sweet and Maxwell) 1997, pg 29
68 Oyajobi; A.V. human rights law and practice vol 3 (1993) pg 10.
69  Malcolm N. Shaw; International law (fourth edition) CambridgeUniversity press, 1997 pg 639
70  Ibid pg 640
71  For example, Article 26 and 28 on the Territorial sea and Contiguous zone
72  J. K. Gamble, Reservations to Multilateral Treaties; A microscopic view, 196
73 Aust, A. Mordern Treaty law and Practice (Cambridge university press, 2000) at pp, 307-308


Click on the related links below and read more.
We can keep you updated on this information, please Subscribe for Free by entering your email address in the space provided.

Do you like this article? Share this article
Follows us on Google Plus Facebook & Twitter

Share on Google Plus


The publications and/or documents on this website are provided for general information purposes only. Your use of any of these sample documents is subjected to your own decision NB: Join our Social Media Network on Google Plus | Facebook | Twitter | Linkedin