PROJECT TOPIC ON MONETIZATION POLICY ON WORKERS PRODUCTIVITY - CHAPTER ONE



IMPACT OF MONETIZATION POLICY ON WORKERS PRODUCTIVITY IN NIGERIA, A STUDY OF EBONYI STATE MINISTRY OF SOLID MINERALS
 

INTRODUCTION
1.1       BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY
            The operation of the modern state requires an institutional structure that is effective and efficient. The civil service has been the corner stone and engine for public sector administration. In the words of Okpala, (2004) civil service is a body of officials responsible for advising the government of the day on matters of policy formulation and implementation of the policies reached by the government.
Due to the ever increasing expense of the scope of governmental involvement in the economy, the cost of managing the public service has become enormous, and the benefits enjoyed by the civil servants has become greatly abused. There is a glaring mismatch between the amount spent and actual benefit that accrues to the beneficiaries.
            As a policy, the government decided to carry out some economic reforms that are aimed at minimizing, if not eliminating virtually all known avoidable wastage. One of such reforms initiated is the monetization of fringe benefits in the public service.
            The immediate past administration of Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, on November 11, 2002, set up a committee on the monetization of the fringe benefits in the public service of federation. The committee was under the chairmanship of Chief U.J.Ekaette, the then secretary to the government. This policy is one of the reformative agenda of the government aimed at minimizing waste in the management of public funds by public office holders.
            The government however, stated the objectives for the introduction of the concept of monetization in the federal public service which includes, minimizing waste, misuse and abuse of public facilities. The monetization of fringe benefits is intended to boost workers moral to work.
            The proceeds or savings realized from the reform policy (monetization) will be used for capital project and other infrastructural development.

1.2       STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM              
            Transparency and accountability in public service have been eroded. Public officers treat public properties with some degree of recklessness. For instance, the provision of public utilities like, telephones, water, electricity, transport facilities by government to public servants have failed to achieve its purposes. There is high waste and abuse of usage of such facilities thereby resulting to exorbitant bills. The medical services rendered by the government, as well as the residential accommodations given to public servants are recklessly handled. There are reckless abuse of such facilities like telephone, water, and electricity.
            There are situations whereby public officers remove fittings whenever they are moved or transferred, simply because the houses does not belong to them again.
            Several regulatory measures were put in place in the past to eradicate this abuse, yet it yielded no positive result. In view of the above problems, the questions that the workers tend to raise and which require investigation are as follows.
1.                  What effect does monetization policy have on the employees productively?
2.                  What benefit will government derive from the policy?
3.                  What are the problems associated with implementation of the policy of monetization?
4.                  How does the policy affect productivity in the Ebonyi State Ministry of solid minerals development?

1.3       OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY        
            According to federal government, one of the ways adopted in solving the problems of waste and misuse of public amenities in public officers possession, is the introduction of policy of monetization into the federal public service.
            The objectives of this study included the following:-
1.                  To ascertain the effects of monetization policy on the employee’s productivity,
2.                  To identify the benefits of the policy as derivable by the government,
3.                  To analyze the advantages and disadvantages that accrues to the government from this policy,
4.                  To identify the problems associated with implementation of the monetization policy,
5.                  To examine the policy as it affects productivity in the Ebonyi State Ministry of solid mineral development;
6.                  To make recommendations that may enhance the productivity in the ministry and suggest ways of ameliorating the problems encountered in the ministry.     

1.4       SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
            The main thrust of the topic is to examine the likely effects of monetization policy on workers productivity, using Ebonyi State Ministry of solid minerals development as a case study. In this regard, the research will be of a high significance not only to the researcher, but also to the ministry being studied, and in other government and non-government establishments.
            The study and its findings will contribute significantly to existing literature in the subject area.
            The study will equally assist the ministry to improve or maintain their level of productivity considering the policy in vogue.
            Finally, the significance of this work to other researchers such as students, lecturers and others cannot be over-emphasized, as researchers who intend to write on similar topic will use it as a point of reference.

1.5       SCOPE AND LIMITATION OF THE STUDY    
            The ministry of solid minerals development, metamorphosed from the former ministry of commerce and industry in 2003. It is located at the secretariat complex opposite unity square Abakaliki, Abakaliki local government Area of Ebonyi State. The ministry is made up of six departments with staff strength of about two hundred and forty (240).
            Because no success is achieved without some hitches, the researcher was not able to cover other ministries apart from solid minerals development.
            Data collected at Ebonyi State office was without some initial hitches. There was fear of divulging of official information. The staff were apprehensive of the exercise because of fear of being sacked if it is discovered that they leaked official information.
            There was also difficulty in getting some vital documents as a result of poor record keeping and carelessness on the part of staff of the ministry. However, the researcher was able to get useful data for the analysis of the study, after so m much search with the staff and information gotten one on one from some key officials of the ministry.

1.6       RESEARCHER HYPOTHESIS     
            A Hypothesis is a conjectural statement of relationship between two or more variable. It is a tentative statement which is open to confirmation or rejection. In the light of this, the hypotheses of the work are as follows:-
            Hi        Monetization policy plays a vital role on workers’                               productivity.
            Ho       Monetization policy does not play any role on                                      workers’ productivity.
            Hi        Monetization policy has affected the productivity of               workers in the ministry of solid minerals                                               development. 
Ho       Monetization policy has not affected the productivity of workers in the ministry of solid minerals development.
 
1.7       THEORETICAL FRAME WORK                                                                     
            The usage of wrong or inappropriate theory in a particular research topic will definitely produce wrong conclusion.
            Hence, the researcher adopted cost benefit analysis (CBA) propounded by J. H Kirt.
            This is a technique for analyzing polices programmes and projects. It could be used to determine the most efficient decision alternative. The technique could be applied either before undertaking the project or after the project. The purpose is to determine the usefulness of the project.
            It involves the systematic examination of all the cost of a programme in terms of tangibility and real or opportunity cost. Possible benefits of a project are enumerated, the impact of a proposed or actual policy or project are determined or grouped as benefits or cost.
            Prior to the introduction of the monetization policy, the federal government operated as policy in which fringe benefits were provided for public servants as it related to residential accommodation, provision of furniture, utility and domestic servants allowance, motor vehicle fueling, transport and systematically examining all the cost of the programme that government discovered enormous wastages and inefficiency as a result of abuse of those fringe benefits.
            This now necessitated the introduction of monetization policy as a policy with the highest net benefit or social value by relating the cost to the benefits.
            Cost benefit analysis as theory affords the means or tool for measuring in quantitative and monetary terms, the previous policy of provision of fringe benefit with view to ascertaining the cost and benefits and comparing it with the analyzed and evaluated cost benefit of the monetization policy quantifiable in monetary terms.     
            No doubt however, that the cost benefit analysis as a theory provided the policy makers and the government with a broad view of cost and benefit and also direct attention to the utility of the project.
            The relevant of this theory is that organization is made up of the managers and the workers; and these people are sometime needed to be motivated. The cost benefit analysis relates that the cause of this inefficiency and low productivity in civil service are psychological, social and economic factors, recommended that managers should observe the welfare and feeling of workers if organization will progress.                                 

1.8       OPERATION OF KEY CONCEPTS


a.   Impact -  A strong impression or effect on workers in organizational activities.
b. Monetization Policy - This is a governmental policy whereby value is given to public officers in the state and federal civil service in place of certain amenities enjoyed by them.
c. Workers Productivity -This means the rate at which an employee yield output in the organization
d.   Fringe Benefit – It is an additional service or advantage   given with job besides the wages.
e. Ministry - It is a government department that is responsible for one of the areas of government work.
f.  Solid Mineral- A solid substance that is formed      naturally in the earth such as coat, stone, gold, salt etc.
g.  Development- The gradual growth of something, so that it will become bigger or more advanced.


THIS IS A SAMPLE | WE ARE PROFESSIONALS IN WRITING



Click on the related links below and read more.
We can keep you updated on this information, please Subscribe for Free by entering your email address in the space provided.

Do you like this article? Share this article
Follows us on Google Plus Facebook & Twitter
CONTACT US TODAY FOR OUR SERVICES
Share on Google Plus

Declaimer - MARTINS LIBRARY

The publications and/or documents on this website are provided for general information purposes only. Your use of any of these sample documents is subjected to your own decision NB: Join our Social Media Network on Google Plus | Facebook | Twitter | Linkedin

READ RECENT UPDATES HERE