THEORETICAL LITERATURE OF IMPLEMENTATION OF EXPORT PROMOTION POLICIES IN NIGERIA



          The theoretical underpinning up which export promotion is anchored is on Hecksher-Ohline factor endowment trade theory. According to this theory, countries that are rich in capital should specialize in the production and export of capital intensive commodities while those that have much labour should focus on production and export of labour-intensive commodities. They also argued that the redirection of demand which results from international trade
also equalizes the prices of factors of production (Gbosi, 1999).
          According to Morton and Tullock (1978), international trade brings gains to a nation whether rich or poor and that it acts as a stimulus to growth. Some observers, though accepting the above assertion, are of the view that the growth is insignificant among the developing countries for the reason that they are less developed and lacked responsiveness to market opportunities and dynamic influences of international trade that is characterized by developed market economies.
          Gerald (1976), holds that the reason for limited gain from international trade by less developed countries, is the inadequacy of market opportunities, pointed that the slow growth of export earning from many primary commodities, the rest attendant in less developed countries, current degree of specialization in such exports and difficulties of obtaining access to overseas markets for a more diversified range of export products.
          In line with the above assertion, Breand (1958) opined that the economies of many of the poor nations of the world are characterized by a dynamic export sector. He further contended that the productivity of the export sector is often higher than that of the domestic sector. In his view, Kindleberger (1968), also agreed that a rise in export usually leads to an increase in national output. It is against this background that Rostow (1960), identified export as the leading sector of an economy.
          Little, et al., (1970), and Bela (1971), opined that exports forces integration into work markets and a more efficient allocation of resources, because external markets impose discipline by eliminating uncompetitive firms, implying that exports effect positively the supply-side of the economy.
Export promotion as noted by Ajakaiye (2001) can only come into being if and if there are exportable products. He further held the export promotion involves the realization of the country’s natural resources and the full exploration of the resources for exportation.
In a study on how to actualize the objective of export promotion Arthur Lewis (1991) focus on the effect of foreign exchange which is a constraint on a developing economy’s export. From this study he made his point clear by stating that even though foreign exchange problem occurs in the course of export promotion that a country can still overcome the problem by adopting the method of standardized export products. He also emphasised that no matter the value of a given country’s current to another that the country can still make substantial profit by exporting high quality products hence balance its economy through growth in its Gross Domestic Product.
ARTICLE SOURCE: CHIAMAKA NANCY OKEAGU
ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT, EBONYI STATE UNIVERSITY 
Share on Google Plus

Declaimer - Unknown

The publications and/or documents on this website are provided for general information purposes only. Your use of any of these sample documents is subjected to your own decision NB: Join our Social Media Network on Google Plus | Facebook | Twitter | Linkedin

READ RECENT UPDATES HERE