THE ROLE OF LABORATORY COAT IN NOSOCOMIAL INFECTION

          Nosocomial infections are hospital acquired infections by a patient who was admitted for a reason other than that infection, an infection not present at the time of admission. This includes infections acquired in the hospital but appearing after the patient’s discharge, and also occupational infection among staffs of the hospital. It is always secondary to the illness that brought the patient to the hospital. Generally, infections occurring more than 48hrs after admission or discharge are usually considered as nosocomial infection. The organisms that cause these nosocomial infections may originate from the patient’s own flora, medical personnel and hospital environment or from different medical device such as stethoscope, surgical material, white laboratory
coat etc.    
            The white laboratory coat is an example of non-critical device (Schiff, 2006). It is non-critical in that it only comes in contact with intact skin and does not by pass the skin hence it is hardly implicated in the transmission of infection. Nosocomial infections are also divided into two classes, endemic or epidemic. Most are endemic, meaning that they are at the level of usual occurrence within the setting while epidemic infections occurs when there is infection above baseline for a specific infection or organism.

            The opinion of patients and physicians on the role of a white laboratory coat regarding transmission of infection seems to be different. In a study on 276 patients and 86 physicians, 154 patients (56%) thought doctors should wear a white laboratory coat (Douse et al, 2004). When asked for the reason 30% of these patients sited prevention of infection, whereas 70% of physicians who thought white laboratory coat should not be worn believed that white laboratory coats transmitted hospital-acquired infections. But does a white laboratory coat actually prevent or spread infection? In another study at the East Birmingham Hospital, Staphylococcus aureus was isolate from up to 25% of white laboratory coat (Wong et al., 2002), implying the possibility of transmitting infection. Although studies have documented microbial contamination of physician’s white laboratory coats suggesting a potential risk (Loh et al., 2000) and (Grys and Pawlaezyk, 2004), it is not clear whether they actually increase risk of hospitals-acquired infection. A steady state of maximal biological contamination was reached within the first week of use and did not change significantly thereafter (Wong, et al., 2002). 

In addition, microbial colonization of white laboratory coat or other clothing item such as tie is not necessarily synonymous to an ability to spread infection. The absence of a well-matched control population (i.e. physicians not wearing white laboratory coats with their stethoscopes often hanging around their necks, while examining a similar patient population) makes it difficult to make a conclusion on the potential role of white coats in increasing the risk infection.
            In addition to white laboratory coats, neckties have also been implicated in the spread of nosocomial infection (Dixon, 2000). Ties can be colonized with potentially dangerous germs, including methicillin resist S. aureus, with the theoretic possibility of cross infection (Nurkin, 2004).
Share on Google Plus

Declaimer - Unknown

The publications and/or documents on this website are provided for general information purposes only. Your use of any of these sample documents is subjected to your own decision NB: Join our Social Media Network on Google Plus | Facebook | Twitter | Linkedin

READ RECENT UPDATES HERE