The University of Nigeria, Nsukka has announced its official cut off mark for the 2017/2018 Post UTME screening exercise. This was made public Friday by the registrar of the institution, Chris Igbokwe, who said the institution had pegged its cut off mark at 200 after a brief consultation.
Part of the statement issued by the institution read: This is to inform the general public that the cut-off mark for admission into the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN) for 2017/2018 academic session is 200. Also, there will be a Post-UTME Aptitude Test/Screening Exercise.
The Joint Admission and Matruculation Board, JAMB, had recently announced that its official cut off mark for universities was 120, raising questions and expectations regarding what University of Nigeria, UNN, was going to cut.
UNN, known for its quality and standard as the first indigenous university in Nigeria said Friday that the general public should get ready as the institution will conduct entrance examination for students this year.
UNN set to conduct post-UTME
It would be recalled that the university did not conduct this entry exams for admission seekers last year following the ban placed by JAMB which prohibited schools from conducting the exams.
The Registrar of JAMB, Ishaq Oloyede, had issued a statement saying that the main reason for the proscription of the exercise last year was due to corruption as universities used the exercise to extort money from students.
Having pegged the cut off at 120, JAMB also beckoned on institutions not to charge students more than N2000 for screening forms.
Now that UNN has placed its cut off at 200, there is speculation that the application fee may change as well but with a little difference.
The institution had however advised the general public to keep visiting its website for the Post Utme application.
UNN post-UTME
The implications of the lowered JAMB cut off marks on our education system: Nigerians have continued to react following the announcement of the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) to reduce the cut-off marks for admission into tertiary institutions According to the examination body the decision was taken by stakeholders in the education sector to make admission process more flexible.
A writer in this piece talks about the implications the new cut-off mark would have on our education system. The new cutoff mark for entry into tertiary institutions announced on Tuesday by the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) has become a topic discourse. According to news reports, JAMB and the Vice Chancellors of all Nigerian universities agreed that 120 should be the cut off mark for entrants into universities. For polytechnics and other institutions, it the mark was pegged at 100 minimum.
It has been difficult for many of us understanding the rationale behind the resolution reached by the authorities. For me, I had thought hypothetically that it was another attempt to increase the chances of admission for those from educationally disadvantaged areas in the country.
We are not unfamiliar with situations where standards were lowered for admission into unity schools for certain students based on their states of origin. Perhaps, it was because many candidates performed below expectation in the exams. Most of those I know of score above 250 marks. But this was an entirely computer-based exam written by many candidates who were perhaps seeing a computer for the first time. Maybe our assumptions were wrong.
It would be nice if JAMB could be giving the public a breakdown of candidates' performance as the West African Examinations Council (WAEC) and the National Examinations Council (NECO) do every year to help us understand the extent of candidates' performances in the exams. However, I learnt that the reason behind resorting to such a low mark was for the sake of 'equity.
JAMB lamented situations whereby universities would publicly declare 200. For instance, as cut off mark but would still consider the candidate of one highly placed personal who scored lower than that for admission but would deny the son of a nobody admission even when that one scored above the required mark. It was added that JAMB gave each university the free will to determine whichever cut off mark it prefers while ensuring that it does not accept anyone who scores lower than that. The case of universities admitting those who scored below the cut off point is not new. This is not related to the exceptional cases of educationally disadvantaged areas or catchment areas. I'm aware a private university in Ogun State admitted a student who scored 150 to study Mass Communication despite publicly announcing 180 as its cut off mark. Money doeth it all, some would say. The situation is applicable in many public universities too for those who 'know the way'.
JAMB had promised to check such. No matter how low JAMB pegs its cut off mark, universities like the University of Lagos (UNILAG) and the University of Ibadan (UI) expectedly would not lower their standard for admissions. The two schools have been particularly known for setting the pace. It would be recalled that when JAMB pegged the cut off at 180 over the decades, it was UNILAG which first insisted on 200 as its cut off mark for all courses before some of its contemporaries followed suit years later. It was also the university which first adopted the notion of taking in only those who make it their first choice dubbing it the 'university of first choice'.
The admission screening procedure
Federal Government instructed universities to adopt last year. Back to the issue at hand, leaving universities to determine their individual cut off marks not lower than the proposed 120 marks leaves certain implications. First, it would would worsen the decay in our education system. There are likely to be more university products who cannot favorably compete with their counterparts elsewhere. What do we expect from beneficiaries of mediocrity other than being mediocre?
Only the exceptional ones may make a name for themselves. Also, the situation would put certain universities on the watch. Future employers would care about which university one graduated from, more than ever. Prior to this new development, we have had cases where graduates were being discriminated against on account of the part of the country they earned their degrees. It would just get worse since obviously there is the likelihood that most of the universities to follow the lowered standard in the cut off point would do so in consideration of the indigence of the said part.
Equally, the notion of superiority of one university over another would be much more pronounced. You can't compare a graduate who gained admission on the basis of higher merit with that which did on lower merit. This may seem petty but may just lead to some stereotype about certain class of students from certain sets of universities. We should not forget that a major reason behind the ongoing strike by the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) is the call for improved standard of education. We shouldn't expect things to get better in our education system if we continue to place low premium on academic excellence.
Read more:
- How much does nigerian breweries pay graduates
- Best paying companies in nigeria
- Best companies to work for in nigeria 2017
- Highest paying companies in nigeria 2017
- Best companies to work for in nigeria 2018
- Top 100 companies to work for in nigeria 2017
- Highest paying companies in nigeria 2018
- Best places to work in nigeria 2017