Values
are means of quintuplicate determination and the values with (±) are the
standard deviation. Mean values within
each column followed by the same subscript are not significant different
(P>0.05).
|
Samples
|
% sand
|
% silt
|
%clay
|
PH
|
P(mg/kg)
|
N%
|
%OC
|
% OM
|
|
ControlT1)
|
76.17b±0.120
|
1465a±0.112
|
9.25b±0.112
|
4.77ab±0.224
|
14.65d±0.112
|
0.075±0.011
|
0.663a0.321
|
1.38b±0.014
|
|
Goat
urine (T2)
|
75.17c±0.120
|
14.64a±0.129
|
10.25a±0.112
|
4.67b±0.086
|
17.55c±0.0112
|
0.117b±0.079
|
0.662a±0.320
|
1.37b±0.013
|
|
Cattle
Urine (T3)
|
76.15b0.112
|
13.47b±0.492
|
10.27a±0.104
|
4.85a±0.016
|
26.11b+0.503
|
0.150a±0.016
|
0.649a±0.005
|
1.14c±0.062
|
|
Human
urine (T4)
|
72.22a±0.135
|
13.52b±0.415
|
9.29b±0.082
|
4.63b.0.079
|
28.35a±0.112
|
0.156a±0.002
|
0.927a±0.005
|
1.64a±0.096
|
|
Samples
|
Ca
|
Mg
|
K
|
Na
|
EA
|
ECEC
|
%BS
|
|
Controls
(T1)
|
1.61c±0.097
|
0.84b±0.099
|
0.187b±0.001
|
0.09d±0.002
|
0.49c±0.011
|
3.17d±0.002
|
86.00b±1.581
|
|
Goat
urine (T2)
|
3.27b±0.120
|
1.25b±0.112
|
0.186b±0.066
|
0.10c±0.001
|
0.88b±0.0017
|
5.59c±0.056
|
85.00b±1.581
|
|
Cattle
Urine (T3)
|
5.00a ± 1.581
|
3.00a±1.581
|
0.33a±0.120
|
0.13b±0.002
|
0.16d±0.011
|
6.55b±0.088
|
98.00a± 1.581
|
|
Human
urine (T4)
|
4.45a±0.112
|
1.65b±0.112
|
0.33a±0.016
|
0.15a ±0.001
|
0.97a.±0.011
|
7.45a±0.031
|
87.20b± 2.387
|
Percentage(%) Sand
The values of % sand ranged from
72.22% to 76.17% with control (T1) having the highest value of
76.17% and Human urine (T4) having the lowest value of 72.22%. From
the analysis of variance carried out, it was observed that their was a
significant difference (P<0.05) between samples T2 and T4
while there was no significant difference (P>0.05) between samples T1
and T3. It may be due to the influence of the type of feel and its
content. It may be due to the content or organic matter present in the soil.
Percentage(%)Silt
The values of % silt ranged from 13.47% to 14.65% with
control(T1) having the
highest value of 14.65% and cattle urine(T3)
having the lowest value of 13.47%. From the analysis of variance carried out,
it was observed that their was a significant difference (p<0.05) between
samples T1 and T3 while there was no significant
difference (P>0.05) between samples T2 and T4. It may
be due to unusual hormonal “stress relaxation” response in prisoners with
conviction for assault.
Percentage Clay
The values of % clay ranged form 9.25%
to 10.27% with cattle urine (T3) having the highest value of 10.27%
and control (T1) having the lowest value of 9.25%. From the analysis
of variance carried out, it was observed that there was a significant
difference (P<0.05) between samples T1T3, while there
was no significant difference (p>0.05) between samples T2 and T3.
It may be due to the influence of nitrogen and sulfur intake on bovine uterine
pH throughout the luteal phase.
Percentage pH
The values of percentage % pH ranged from 4.63% to
4.85% with cattle urine (T3) having the highest value of 4.85% and
Human urine (T4) having the lowest value of 4.63%. From the analysis
of variance carried out, it was observed that there was a significant
difference (P<0.05) between samples T3 and T4, while
there was no significant difference between samples T2 and T1.
It may be due to the metabolism of progesterone by human lecukocyctes. (Scully
C, et al. Clin Immunil. Immuno Pittol & 1982).
Percentage p(Mg/Kg)
The values of percentage p(mg/kg) ranged form 14.65%
to 28.35%, with Human urine (T4) having the highest value of 28.35%
and control (T1) having the lowest value of 14.65%. From the
analysis of variance carried out, It was observed that there was a significant
difference (P<0.05) between samples T1 and T4, while
there was no significant difference between sample T2 and T3.
It may be due to it composition of P. Ethylpheny/sulphmic acid. (Grant JK, et
.al J. Ani. Sci. 2013).
Percentage (%) N
The values of %N ranged from 0.075% to
0.156 with Human urine (T4) having the highest value of 0.156% and
control treatment (T1) having the lowest value of 0.075%. From the
analysis of variance carried out, it was observed that there was a significant
(P>0.05) between treatments T1 and T4, while there was
no significant different (P>0.05) between treatment T2 and T3.
It may be due to the type of bedding materials used.
Percentage (%) O.C
The
values of % OC ranged form 0.649% to 0.927% with Human urine (T4)
having the highest value of 0.927% and cattle urine (T3) having the
lowest values of 0.649%. From the analysis of variance carried out, it was
observed that there was a significant difference (P<0.05) between sample T3
and T4, while there was no significant difference (p>0.05)
between samples T1 and T2.
Percentage(%) O.M
The
values of % O.M ranged from 1.14% to 1.64%, with Human urine (T4)
having the highest values 1.64%% and cattle urine (T3) having the
lowest values of 1.14%. From the analysis of variance carried out, it was
observed that there was a significant difference (P<0.05) between samples T3
and T4, while there was no significant difference (P>0.05)
between samples T1 and T2. It may be due to the
environment they are kept and the type of feed given to them.
Percentage (%) Ca
The values of % Ca ranged from 1.64% to 5.00%,
with cattle urine (T3) having the highest values of 5.00% and
control (T1) having the lowest values 1.64%. From the analysis of
variance carried out, it was observed that there was a significant difference
(P<0.05) between samples T1 and T3, while there was no
significant difference (P>0.05) between sample T2 and T4.
Parentage (%)
Mg
The values of % magnesium (mg) ranged from 0.84% to
3.00% with cattle urine (T3) having the highest value of 3.00% and
control (T1) having the lowest value of 0.84%. From the analysis of
variance carried out. It was observed that there was a significant difference
(p<0.05) between sample T1 and T3, while there was no significant
difference (p>0.5) between samples T2 and T4. It may
be due to their environment tap condition or the type of water they take.
Percentage (%) Potassium (K)
The values of % potassium (k) ranged from 0.186% to
0.33% with cattle urine (T3) having the highest values of 0.33% and
goat urine (T2) having the lowest value of 0.186%. From the analysis
of variance carried out. It was observed that there was a significant
difference (P< 0.05) between sample T3 and T2, while
there was no significant difference (p> 0.05) between samples T4
and T1. It may be due to their housing materials or the way they are
kept.
Percentage (%) Soduim (Na)
The values of % Na ranged from 0.09% to 0.15% with
human urine (T4) having the highest value of 0.15%. From the
analysis of variance carried out, it was observed that there was a significant
difference (p<0.05) between samples T4 and T1, while
there was no significant difference (p<0.05) between samples T2
and T3.
Percentage (%) Exchangeable Acidity (Ea)
The values of % EA ranged from 0.16% to 0.97% with
human urine (T4) having the highest value of 0.97% and cattle urine
(T3) having the lowest value of 0.16% from the analysis of variance
carried out, it was observed that there was a significant difference
(p<0.05) between samples T3 and T4, while there was no
significant difference (>0.05) between sample T1 and T2.
Percentage (%) ECEC
The values of the % ECEC ranged from 3.17% to 7.45%
with human urine (T4) having the highest value of 7.45% and control
(T1) having the lowest value of 3.17%. From the analysis of variance
carried out, it was observed that there was a significant difference (<0.05)
between sample T1 and T4 while there was no significant
difference (p>0.05) between samples T2 and T3. It may
be due to the type grazing given to them. Lanter et al: Hanks 1991.
Percentage (%) Base Saturation (BS)
The values of % BS ranged from 85% to 98% with
cattle urine (T3) having the highest value of 98.00% and Goat urine
(T2) having the lowest value of 85%. From the analysis of variance
carried out, it was observed that there was a significant difference
(p<0.05) between samples T2 and T3 while there was no
significant difference (p>0.05) between samples T1and T4.
It may be due to the nutrient content of the feed. Arthur, 0. (1984)