PRESENTATION OF RESULTS AND FINDINGS FROM FACTORS THAT MILITATE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF 6-3-3-4 SYTEM

CHAPTER FOUR

Factors That Militate Against The Implementation Of 6-3-3-4 System As Encountered By Heads Of Secondary Schools In Onicha Local Government Area Of Ebonyi State

4.1       Presentation of Results and Findings
            This chapter presents and analysis the findings of this study in line with the five research questions that guided the study.
            The results were presented in tables showing the frequency and percentage scores of the responses of the heads and the teachers to the items in different sections of the questions.

4.2       Research Question One   
            In what way did power- politics affect the heads of schools in the implementation of 6-3-3-4 system of education.
Table 1
S/N
ITEM
SA
A
D
SA
1.
Political instability did not provide conducive environment for the policy implementation   
500
25%
100
50%
10
05%
40
20%
2.
Politicization of education decision making alienated effective implementation of the policy
90
45%
102
51%
03
1.5%
05
2.5%
3.
Political patronage limited the principal administrative control of the schools  
80
40%
110
555
0
0%
10
05%
4.
The influence of politicians in recruitment of teachers did not affect the principals effective implementation of the school system     
90
40%
100
50%
02
1.0%
04
2.0%
From table 1 above, which contains three items drawn from research question one, the following responses were given. In item 1, 50 respondents strongly agree which in 25%, 100 agreed, which is 55 10 strongly disagree which is 05% while 40 (20%) disagree.
            In item 2, 90 strongly agree which is 45%, 102 agree and that is 51% 03 strongly agree which is 1.5% while 5 disagree which is 2.5% item 3 has the following result strongly agree 80 respondents (40%), 110 agree (55%) strongly agree has nil (0%), while agree has 10 which is 05%.
            In item 4 94 strongly agree which is 46%, 100-agree which is 50% while 2 strongly disagree is 1.% and 4-disagree which mean 2.0% of the percentage score.

4.3       Research Question Two       
            How did planning without accurate data affect the head of schools implementation of the 6-3-3-4 system.
Table  
S/N
ITEM
SA
A
D
SA
5.
Lack of reliable planning figures affects educational policy implementation
150
75%
46
23%
02
01%
02
01%
6.
Under-estimation of students enrolment is a major constraint in educational police implementation 
60
30%
100
50%
10
50%
30
155
7.
Lack of accurate planning figure results to inadequate financial resources
18
9.0%
98
49%
04
2.0%
80
40%
8.
Unreliable statistical data does not result to provision of inadequate human resources policy implication 
10
1.0%
10
50%
108
54%
80
40%

            From table above, in item 5, 150 respondent strongly agree, which is 75%, 46 (23%) agree, 2(1%) each strongly agree and disagree.
            In item 6, 60-stronlgy agree which is 30% 100 agree which is 50%, 10 strongly disagree with is 5.0% while 30 disagree which is 150%.
            The result in item 7. are: 18 strongly agree which is (1.0%), 10- agree which is 5.0% while greatest number of 108-stronlgy disagree which is 54% and 80 disagree which is 40%

4.4       Research Questions Three   
            How did lack of consultation contribute to head of schools implementation problem of the 6-3-3-4 system.



S/N
ITEM
SA
A
D
SA
9.
Some head of schools did not understand the policy because they were not consulted at the planning stage
60
305
90
455
10
5.0%
40
20%
10.
Head of schools non-participant in educational planning results to inability to implement the policy in it’s spirit and purpose 
30
15%
102
51%
08
40%
60
30%
11.
If all involved, especially head of schools and teacher are taken into confidence and the input ideas sough all polices well be implemented 
50
25%
94
46%
06
3.0%
40
20%
12.
Continuous assessment policy of the 6-3-3-4 system failed because of some teachers lack of understanding of it’s aims and objectives
30
15%
100
50%
29
10%
50
255
           
            In table 3 above, item 9 indicates that 60-respodnent strongly agree which is 30%-agree which 45% while 10 strongly disagree which is 5.0% and 40-disagree which is 20%.
            In item 10, 8-stronlgy disagree which is 4.0% and 60 disagree which is 30%. The result in item 11 shows that 50 respondent (25%) strongly agree, 94 (40% agree), 6 (30%) strongly disagree and 40 (20) disagree while 20 (10%) strongly disagree and 50 (25%) disagree.

4.5       Research Question Four  
            To what extent did lack of human and material resources jeopardize the implementation of the 6-3-3-4 system
S/N
ITEM
SA
A
D
SA
13.
In our secondary schools, there were enough qualified teachers
180
90%
17
8.5%
01
0.5%
02
1.0%
14.
Government does not provide enough find for the education sector like annual budget to education
100
50%
50
25%
12
6.0%
38
19%
15.
Adequate materials  like learning materials and accommodation do not affect heads in policy implementation
04
2.0%
20
10%
140
70%
36
165
16.
Lack of trained and experienced system managers contribute to the problems of policy implementation  
120
60%
75
37.55
0
0%
05
25%
          
            From table 4 above , in item out of 200 respondents, 180 (90%) strongly agree, 17 (8.5%) agree, but only 1(0.5%0 strongly disagree, and 2 (10%) disagree.
            In item 14, 100(50%) strongly agree, (25%0 agree while 12 (6.0%) strongly disagree and 38(19%) disagree.
            The result of item 15 shows that 4 respondents (2.0%) strongly agree, 20(10%) agree while 140(17%) strongly disagree and 38(18%) disagree.
            In item 16 it indicates that 120 respondents (60%) strongly agree, while 75(375%) agree, no respondent (0%) strongly disagree while 5(2.5%) disagree.

4.6       Research Question Five                    
            How did financial indiscipline contribute to heads schools implementation problem of 6-3-3-4 system. 
S/N
ITEM
SA
A
D
SA
17.
Majority of the principal is corrupt and fraudulent
45
25%
90
50%
15
05%
40
20%
18.
There were rampart embezzlement of fundament for the implementation of the policy  
110
555
73
36.5%

05
2.5%
12
60%
19.
The corrupt practices of Nigeria leaders to not affect policy implementation    
01
0.55
05
2.5%
150
75%
44
22%
20.
Some principals aided in exam malpractices as a result of some financial and other natural benefits
90
45%
60
305
04
20%
36
18%
               
            From taste 5 above, the result shows that in item 17, 45 (22.5%) strongly agree – 90(45%) agree while 15 (7.550 strongly disagree and 40 (20%) disagree.
            In item 18, 110 respondents strongly agree which is 555, 73-agree which is 36.5%, 5-stronlgy disagree which is 25% and 12 disagree which is 6.0%
            The result of item 19 indicates that only 1 respondent strongly agree which is 0.5%, 5 agree which is 2.5 while 150 respondents which is 75% strongly disagree then 44 disagree which is 22%.
            Finally in item 20, 90 (45%) strongly agree 60 (30%) agree, while 4 (2.0%) strongly disagree and 36 (18%) disagree.
Share on Google Plus

Declaimer - MARTINS LIBRARY

The publications and/or documents on this website are provided for general information purposes only. Your use of any of these sample documents is subjected to your own decision NB: Join our Social Media Network on Google Plus | Facebook | Twitter | Linkedin

READ RECENT UPDATES HERE