WHAT IS THE MEANING OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT


Armstrong (2006) defined performance simply in output terms as the achievement of quantified objectives .He went further to state that a performance is not only a matter of what people achieve, but how they achieve it.
Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, 7th edition (2006) defined performance as how well or badly you do something, how well or badly something works; the act or process of performing a task, an action, etc. It also defined the concept as an act that involves a lot of effort or trouble, sometimes when it is not necessary.

Hofrichter and McGovern (2001: 80) clarified that:
·         Performance is driven from the top down, not from the bottom up, where you see high performance you will find the presence of strong focused leadership.

·         Performance is the product of winning behaviour. When leaders and employees consistently do the things that enable an organization to ‘win’ –to compete successfully, high performance is the outcome.
·         Winning behaviour can be modeled effectively by competencies
·         Performance is always about achieving specific measurable goals that help the organization to win.
·         Performance is defined by measurement because it is a physical quantity and lastly
·         Performance is shaped by the promise of reward (and the fear of punishment).
From the above, it is clear that performance is a complex issue that is beyond one formula solution, as some people have thought.

Source: Hofrichter D. A. and McGovern T. (2001) “People, Competencies and Performance; Clarifying Means and Ends”.Compensation Benefits Review, 33 (4) 36.


Furthermore, Brumbach (1988: 220) expressed performance as follows:

                        Performance means both behaviour and results.
                        Behaviours emanate from the performer and
                        transform performance from abstraction to action.
                        not just the instruments for result. Behaviours are
                        also outcomes in their own right-the product of
                        mental and physical effort applied to tasks-and can
                        be judged apart from results.

The above definition leads to the conclusion that when managing performance both input (behaviour) and output (results) need to be considered. Performance is not only evaluated through the achievement of a set objective, standard or targets, as in the case of “Management By Objectives” but cover such competence factors as achievement of expected levels of competence as well as objective setting and review.

Competence plays a vital role in the process of organization performance. Hoevemeyer (2004: 50) defined competency as:

                        A behaviour, knowledge, skill or capability that describes
                        The expected performance in a particular work context
                        (e.g. job function). When they are appropriately developed
                        they are the standards of success that support the strategic
                        plan, vision, mission and goals of the organization.

Performance management is a key tool for delivering better outcome to stakeholders. It is a combination of many elements.
Share on Google Plus

Declaimer - Unknown

The publications and/or documents on this website are provided for general information purposes only. Your use of any of these sample documents is subjected to your own decision NB: Join our Social Media Network on Google Plus | Facebook | Twitter | Linkedin

READ RECENT UPDATES HERE