COMPARE NIGERIA'S BUDGET AND EXPLAIN THE ECONOMIC IMPLICATION OF EACH OF THEM


Looking at this comparative  analysis  table  of  2011 and  2012  of our budget,  presented by our dear president  Goodluck Jonathan  at different intervals  geared towards the achievement of transformation agenda in Nigeria.  As  we can  observe from the table,  2012  budget of  N4.749  trillion  is a bit  higher than  2011  budget  of N4.226  trillion.
Taking cognizance of the figure in table   we will clearly observe the slightly  differences in  2011   and  2012 budget from its proposals  N4.226  and N4,749  respectively.  The budget of 2012  increase by N523   from that of  2012 both  having security and defense  having  the
upper hand in  the  table though  higher in  2011   than 2012   through know it is because of  election.  The educational sector, health more especially the  agricultural sector was drastically reduced to the dearestet msinimum in  2012  not minding that   agriculture employed  75%  of  the  workforce   which  in solves the problem unemployment  and provide raw materials for industrials  which gears  toward  economic growth and development.  The debt service being on the increase in the table showing that we continue  to acquire debt to provide   essential  ammonites  to citizenry instead of  prudence management of our  resources
Both  2011   and  2012  budget was  under utilized as our economy increasing in a  decreasing  rate  as it fails to achieve  its objectives as proposed by the president in his speeches  towards achievement of transformation agenda . I can remember, vividly, when Mr. President presented 2012. He said this budget is a stepping stone to the transformation   of our economy and  country , in  our walk to economic freedom “. Which   economic freedom have we achieved as the country  is still dependent on foreign  aids  even  in the  importation of foods  items  could you just imagine  the economy  recorded impressive growth of  7.85  per cent  in  2010  and later reduced to  7.72%  in the second quarter of  2011
 

2011
2012

N6n
N6n
Budget  proposal 
4.226
4.749



Capital
1006
1320
Recurrent
2.482
2,470

3,488
3790
Statutory transfer d
196
398
Debt servicing
542
561
Total
4226
4749



High lighted sectors


Security
1042
922
Education
489
400
Health
339
283
Agric
139
79
Niger delta
57
60

2066
1744
Debt servicing
542
561
Statutory transfer
196
398
Other sectors
1422
2046
Total
4226
4749

IMPLICATION OF 2012 BUDGET EDUCATIONAL SECTOR AS A CASE STUDY
       With  president Goodluck Jonathan  yet to assent  to the  2012   budget, concerned educational stakeholders   have called for the upward revision of the budget to meet voted for education  fails to adequately   address the  funding of the vital sector.
According to a breakdown of the 2012  budget, the sum  of  N400 is billion representing   8.43  percent of the  budget  has been allocated to education .  out  of  this, N345.09bn 82%  was allotted to recurrent  expenditure while  a mager  N55.05bn (18%) is  for  capital  expenditure . N317.896bn was proposed for personnel cost and N27.192bn was for overheads. Also  the main ministry had  a budget proposal for MDGs  N2.173bn,  parastals   5.1962bn colleges of education  4.555bn and  unity  colleges  7.663bn  universities 14.411bn.  The ministry  got a total capital of allocation  of N5.49bn in  2011  out of which  3.688bn  was  released, total  commitments  was N3.49bn and actual draw down was  N2.699bn.
Chairman of the committee senator Uche Chukwumerije said the distribution of funds between recurrent  and capital poses challenges of slow pale,  in  infrastructural  development in the  agencies and institution.
A  further breakdown  showed that while personnel  allocation increased by N38.584bn and capital  3.231bn  respectively, which Uche Chukwumerije says are  not  remarkable enough  to offer great  changes  from  last  years achievements.      
Nigeria’s  educational system  is   bedeviled  by a myriad of problems, which   keeps  worsening by  the day all as  a result of poor  funding . These include poor funding   shortage  of  quality  staff dearth  of  infrastructure,  inadequate  classroom  and offices,
In adequate classroom  laboratories  for teaching and research: shortage of books   and  journals, corruption at  high  and  low  places , cultism, irregular  payments of salaries, examination malpractices, embezzlement of funds   poor record keeping  etc  and  so in  other sisters  sectors of the   economy thereby   leading to stunted  growth   and  development  and killing  the  vision   20:20:  agenda and proposal in Nigeria.

THE ECONOMIC IMPLICATION
This budget betrays government commitment to fiscal  prudence. Allocation  73% of  the  budget amounting to  2.472  trillion to recurrent expenditure  in  2012  budget seems to me very outrageous, and a more away  from  government mantra of fiscal prudence. Though, as one analyst observes that if is not easy to cut recurrent expenditure in one full swoop, this government should have done better than this. The  implication of this  his  that trillion of naira is being cut as fuel subsidy, they  same mount is being move to finance government  expenses  such  as transport and statutory allocation for president,   vice president legislative and ministerial expenses etc.  There is little in the way of prudence in a budget that will borrow about 22.3%  of the total  budget to finance  i.e. current expenses, I do not have problem with government borrowings, bal the budget should have been budget of infrastructural consolidation. About   N1.059  trillion  of the total budget amount of N4.749 trillion is to come from China, Japan , India and  France  as well as domestic  borrowings this is about   quarter of the overall budget.
In  a global  period chartered by an  unrwaled  global debt crisis  it seems unwise to borrow money to  finance expenses like salary allowances, and over bloated  ministerial budgets. At a time  major countries around  the world are drastically cutting down their budgeting  expenses, we are increasing  ours
The monetary  implication of  increased  government   borrowing for the economy is to increases the rate of  interest  charged by lenders and when interest rates are on the high side, the economic  growth which is  one of   the  objectives of  the macro –economic will sopsides  and also to reduce the amount of Credit  that will be available to the private sectors in the year  2012 .
Despite government conservative for last of 9.5% there still a slight increase in inflation. This is more so  coupled with the removal of fuel subsidy,  from the economy and the resultant devaluation of  naira consistent   with this government  economic agenda.
The any why  one look at it government should have intensity diversification of its  revenue source not only by the current  revert to borrowing  which is  an injection and invariably a leakage in  terms of debt servicing in the economy.  The   expected increase in the  recurrent expenditure will further increase our import bills, by putting pressure  on the demand for imported goods and services  with  little in the way of infrastructural development   increase  interest and inflation  rates,   increase in  the cost of energy not much  should be in  the area of industrial growth and  welfare.
Despite the huge amount budgeted  to  tackle insecurity in the country.  The  security system in  the country are nothing to write home about as it ranges from kidnap, threat from militant groups,  ethno-religious crisis  etc,  I wonder where and what the budgetary allocation to security in Nigeria is been implemented  as  the scourge is still skyrocketing and  posing  a lot of challenges to any development programme in Nigeria.  
Share on Google Plus

Declaimer - Unknown

The publications and/or documents on this website are provided for general information purposes only. Your use of any of these sample documents is subjected to your own decision NB: Join our Social Media Network on Google Plus | Facebook | Twitter | Linkedin

READ RECENT UPDATES HERE